[Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies were Wrong

David M. Budge dave at davebudge.com
Wed Jun 1 09:20:56 PDT 2005


Carl, this seems too big a task even though the mission appears quite 
well placed.  If, however, you find that must needs you to proceed I can 
only offer advice for the tool(s) you should employ.

Simply use any thing with the name brand "Husqvarna" and you can't go wrong.

db

Carl Westberg wrote:

> Well, Donovan, now that you've straightened the unwashed masses out on 
> taxes, I need your assistance on a tricky matter.  I've going to 
> assist in an as yet untried, unproven brain transplant procedure.  Dr. 
> Sarah Bellum and I will be replacing the brain of an Ultra-liberal 
> with that of a thoughtful, extremely knowledgeable young former ASUI 
> senator, hoping it will help the poor, benighted Ultra-liberal come to 
> his senses.  My question is:  would you recommend making the incision 
> near the brainstem, the cerebellum, the hypothalamus, or the 
> cerebrum?  Most importantly, should we use a phillips or flat-head 
> screwdriver?                                     
>                                                                             
>                                                                             
>                                                                             
>  Carl Westberg Jr.
>
>> From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
>> To: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>, 
>> predator75 at moscow.com,        vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies 
>> were Wrong
>> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>> Sunil,
>>
>> There may be a new tax, but if your taxes overall go
>> down that to me is a tax decrease. Now you can argue
>> that if your taxes decrease that is a increase because
>> of the legal and political garbage behind it, but it
>> is still a decrease in your taxes. $95 instead of $100
>> is less, not more. A zero tax would be less than $100
>> too. But $95 is still less than $100 according to my
>> wallet.
>>
>> If you want to argue that $100 is less than $95
>> because $0.00 is less than $95 you are welcome to do
>> so but it is not an argument worthy of my time.
>>
>>
>> Donovan J Arnold
>>
>> --- Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>> Donovan,
>>
>> Since I lack Dan's big brain I am also having trouble
>> following your tax cut logic.  You write that the levy
>> they're paying on NOW is set to expire.  Once that
>> happens, that bill is gone.  They have then agreed to
>> a new tax.  Now, if they had voted it down, they
>> wouldn't pay any tax at all.  That would be a zero tax
>> as far as levies are concerned.  To use your example,
>> they'd go from a $100 tax to a $0.00 tax
>>
>> Since they've agreed to a new tax, isn't that a tax
>> increase?  Haven't they gone from $0.00 to $95, to use
>> your example again?
>> If I have this wrong, please type your response
>> slowly, so that I can follow you.
>>
>> Sunil
>>
>>
>> >From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
>> >To: Dan Carscallen <predator75 at moscow.com>,
>> "'Vision 2020'" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> >Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick
>> and his Allies were Wrong
>> >Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
>> >
>> >Dan, Dan, Dan. . .
>> >
>> >No. That is not what I am saying, and if you read
>> even
>> >just the first few lines of the article you would
>> >understand.
>> >
>> >The old levy that the residents are still paying on
>> >NOW is set to expire. This new levy will cost less
>> >than the one set to expire. So they will be a getting
>> >tax cut.
>> >
>> >
>> >Think of it like this, you are paying $100 on an old
>> >levy, with the levy that passed it will only be $95.
>> >That is a tax cut of $5. The old levy wanted you to
>> >pay $110, which failed. It is pretty simple to figure
>> >out why this one passed. It had nothing to do with
>> >people in Moscow hating children and people in
>> >Boundary county loving children as Wayne concludes.
>> >
>> >Still hoping you will use your "thinking
>> thingamabob".
>> >
>> >Donovan J Arnold
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Yahoo! Mail Mobile
>> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
>> http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
>>
>> _____________________________________________________
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>                http://www.fsr.net
>>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the 
> communities of the Palouse since 1994.                 
> http://www.fsr.net                                
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
>
>



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list