[Vision2020] Otter to sell off public lands
Mark Solomon
msolomon at moscow.com
Mon Dec 19 17:30:52 PST 2005
This re-posted from Spokesman-Review reporter
Betsy Rusell's blog
(http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/boise/).
Betsy's blog along with Randy Stapilus' at
http://www.ridenbaugh.com/ are excellent places
to find out what's really going on in Boise.
m.
Brady denounces Otter move to sell public lands
Democratic candidate for governor Jerry Brady was
joined by former longtime Idaho Fish & Game
Director Jerry Conley and a group of other
prominent sportsmen today at a press conference
decrying a proposed law in Congress that would
force the sale of public lands to pay for
Hurricane Katrina and other disaster response -
with a priority on selling land in states like
Idaho. The bill is co-sponsored by U.S. Rep.
Butch Otter, Brady's Republican opponent in the
race to become Idaho's next governor.
"I've been listening to Idahoans for eight months
now, and not a single one wanted to sell off
Idaho's public lands," Brady said. "Idahoans like
their public land just the way it is. This is not
Democrats versus Republicans. This is too
important for politics. It goes to the heart of
why we live in Idaho."
Otter's legislation, H.R. 3855, was introduced
Sept. 21. It would require the U.S. Secretary of
Agriculture to select 15 percent of the land in
the national forest system and sell it off, and
the Secretary of the Interior to do the same for
Interior lands, excluding national parks.
"Priority locations" are identified as those
states where the feds own more than 15 percent of
the total land area.
Idaho, of course, has massive amounts of federal
land - 63.1 percent of the state.
Otter earlier made waves by voting against an
emergency appropriation for disaster relief for
victims of Hurricane Katrina. At the time, he
said there wasn't enough accountability for the
spending. But his bill simply places the money in
a fund for disaster relief, to "cover or defray
the costs of responding to a natural disaster or
terrorist attack."
The bill, which is co-sponsored by 12 other House
members, also includes a moratorium on any new
acquisitions of federal land.
Brady said the best hunting and fishing land likely would be sold off first.
Jack Trueblood, a recently retired longtime Idaho
Fish & Game employee, said, "This is bad news for
people who hunt and fish in Idaho. Rep. Otter is
showing us, as a congressman, what kind of
governor he would be. For sportsmen and women,
this issue is important enough to decide the
governor's race."
Still awaiting Otter's response
Posted by Betsy | 19 Dec 3:19 PM
Congressman responds
Here's Otter's response. He doesn't say anything
about the impact of his public land-sale bill on
hunting, fishing, or other public access.
"I find it interesting that, at a time when many
local governments are struggling to make ends
meet, some would oppose an effort to restore to
local property tax rolls and Idaho-based
stewardship some carefully selected parcels of
the nearly two-thirds of Idaho that is controlled
- and too often locked up from multiple use - by
the federal government. Even as an absentee
landlord, the federal government has a
responsibility to pay its fair share. This
proposal is a responsible option to consider when
counties in Idaho routinely are shortchanged by
millions of dollars on PILT payments and the
government is failing to maintain such facilities
as the backcountry airstrips needed for emergency
response. It also might be worth asking where the
criticism was when the federal government sold
large portions of the Boise Foothills to the city
of Boise. Are such transfers only valid when they
are proposed by self-appointed conservationists,
and not by those who espouse the broader concept
of multiple-use stewardship?"
Posted by Betsy | 19 Dec 4:02 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20051219/d7251cb3/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list