[Vision2020] Paying for two High School buildings?

[Donovan Arnold]

I did not just direct it at Keely. I said Keely of anyone who can answer.

I want the costs of operating the two schools and the savings from not 
having to rent a building for the alternative high school, the revenue from 
renting out the 1991 annex, and the expected energy savings of the two 
renovations of the  elementary schools.

I have asked members of the FPC, Scott from Hummell, and the Superintendent. 
I was told I would be emailed that information many times by many people and 
am yet to receive it.

Thanks,

Donovan J Arnold

>From: cjs <cjs at turbonet.com>
>To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanarnold at hotmail.com>
>CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Paying for two High School buildings?
>Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:48:49 -0700
>
>Donovan,
>
>This seems like a fair question to ask. Maybe not directed to Keely but 
>indeed to someone who voted in the project of the remodel and the new high 
>school as there are indeed more than Keely that can answer this question.
>
>Have you been to the district and asked the way they want you to ask, for 
>the breakdown of these costs that the school board considered in the 29 mil 
>bond amount? Wait - what about a breakdown of the project that calls for 
>future repairs and operation costs? OK - so help me out here. Who did you 
>ask what? Let's go from there. Someone might contact you off list in a way 
>for you to get EXACTLY what you want. So tell us what you want EXACTLY!
>
>SPELL CHECK RAN..........
>
>Phil
>
>
>-----Original message-----
>From: "Donovan Arnold" donovanarnold at hotmail.com
>Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:34:12 -0700
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] Paying for two High School buildings?
>
> > Keely or anyone?
> >
> > How can we afford to pay for the operation costs of the new high school 
>and
> > the current high school?
> >
> > I am serious. I have asked this question and nobody has clearly answered 
>it.
> >
> > Yes, I do understand that current high school will be renting out the 
>1991
> > annex. I also understand that the alternative High School will be housed
> > inside the current high school. However, this is a big building, more 
>then
> > 100,000 sq ft even after the removal of the 1968 annex.
> >
> > Is the the amount of money raised by renting the 1991 annex, the rent 
>saved
> > by closing the little building currently  housing alternative high 
>school,
> > and the energy efficiency saved by the renovation of the two elementary
> > schools in lighting and heating enough to pay for the operation two high
> > schools?
> >
> > If it is, I would like to see these costs broken down.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Donovan J Arnold
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________________________
> >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>