[Vision2020] Question 1 PROJECT SPENDING/SECURITY FENCE
cjs
cjs at turbonet.com
Sat Apr 23 16:00:43 PDT 2005
Thanks Keely,
I will try to get the correct language as best I can. Maybe we can ask and answer questions according to subjects as question 1, question 2, etc. Then the people that do not want to listen about certain questions can delete? I am asking questions from other people who wish to remain un-named. Some wish to be named but are not subscribers to this list. Just want some answers. Anybody wishing to chime in please do so. WITHOUT RIDICULE OR NASTY REMARKS. Anyone wishing to email me OFF LIST is welcome to do so.
Thank you Keely. A lot of people are listening today and I hope you have the time or can refer me to the appropriate party to get a question answered if you are unable.
So, regarding question 1: Project spending:
Yes, the correct term is "project." So the bond money will be used in the following PROJECT MANNER? The 5 people on the school board including Dr. Donicht are the ones that voted unanimously how to use this bond money in the following manner? It never was asked to the public how to spend the 29 million dollars we are to vote on?
PROJECT:
1) Elemenatary school 1 remodel
2) Elementary school 2 remodel
3) High School remodel
4) New Construction for High School
Now, if the bond does not pass how do we, the tax payers ask for a bond to remodel both elementary schols and the current high school? Like what the Matrix report suggested?
previously asked.........
>How do we get the textbooks and school supplies so desperately needed for
> the children if this bond is only for "construction" purposes? How will the
> maintenance, salaries and operations for the new high school be paid? From
> the bond already passed and the money already in the pot? Or will it need to
> be another bond to vote on from the public adding a new tax?
Keely - I remember reading somewhere that a science class did not have enough books for the students to take home and study for a test they were going to have. This is of course a problem. How do we get the kids all the books they need? I don't want this to transfer to the new HS. I want it handled now. Is it the teacher that gets a "budget" and there is not enough money in his/her budget to buy each student a book? If they are not getting a proper budget to cover this, is it because of the "school budget cuts" that come to us from our elected officials like senator, etc.?
Included in this bond is the future expense cost of maintainng the projects? Is there a document available to the public that shows us the actual breakdown of each project and how the district arrived at the 29 mil?
SECURITY FENCE:
>The Trail family is donating the cost of the fence. This appears to have been lost in the debate.
This indeed will be a wonderful donation as it could be quite expensive. Do we know the value of this fence they are donating? Do I understand that in the Trails original offer where they stated a security fence is required, they meant a security fence will have to be on the donated land period? That they will pay for it but in order for them to gift the land to us they want the school enclosed in a security fence like manner? Do you or anybody listening know exactly what they are buying and putting around the new HS? I would sure like to know, if my kids were of HS age. I think I read somewhere that they would accept a chain link fence. So if they are buying it what will it look like? As a neighbor to the proposed site I would like to know what I am going to be looking at. What if they build a big old and ugly brick wall all around the premsie?
Oh - will the school district own the gifted and purchased land from the Trails free and clear?
Many people admire you in trying to get the public educated. We all understand you are only one person. We all ask where in the heck is your support? Dr. Donicht? Other trustees? FPC? CQE? ANYBODY? Keely - where are the people that are paid to do this job? Where are the people that can help you?
Phil Roderick
-----Original message-----
From: "keely emerinemix" kjajmix1 at msn.com
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 14:42:57 -0700
To: cjs at turbonet.com
Subject: [Spam] RE: answering Phil's questions
> I'm responding to the entire forum since others may want answers to your
> questions.
>
> 1. I don't know what you mean by "four tracks." Please read on . . .
>
> "Tracks" has had a specific usage in our two-year planning, and so I may be
> reading your question too literally. There were three tracks that the
> committee came up with. One (no new construction) was not recommended by
> the FPC, but the other two were; the plan we're considering now was the
> track with near-unanimous support of the committee as well as Supt.
> Donicht's recommendation. The board voted on it Feb. 24 and it passed 5-0.
> The bond amount is sufficient for the four projects (new HS, remodeled WP
> and Russell, remodel of current HS to accommodate alt school, etc., -- maybe
> that's what you mean), insofar as it covers what can legally be covered by a
> bond.
>
> 2. The Trail family is donating the cost of the fence. This appears to
> have been lost in the debate.
>
> 3. Please remember that the change is not in the number of teachers,
> required textbooks, etc., but is a change in facilities and configuration.
> It's still a K-12 district with the same number of teachers, and, again,
> we're simply planning to move our kids and staff to buildings better able to
> handle the long-term demands of education. So the teachers teaching from
> textbooks are already budgeted -- they'll simply move to better,
> bond-funded, facilities. This is not to say that the district will always
> have exactly the same number of staff, kids, etc. -- that changes from year
> to year and is part of our budget planning project. But funds cannot and do
> not "cross over."
>
> keely
>
>
>
> From: cjs <cjs at turbonet.com>
> To: "keely emerinemix" <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
> Subject: [Spam] RE: [Vision2020] supplemental bond/levy
> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:24:51 -0700
>
> Thank you so kindly Keely.
>
> So this bond is all that is required for the completion of the four tracks?
> Like construction only?
>
> How do we get the textbooks and school supplies so desperately needed for
> the children if this bond is only for "construction" purposes? How will the
> maintenance, salaries and operations for the new high school be paid? From
> the bond already passed and the money already in the pot? Or will it need to
> be another bond to vote on from the public adding a new tax? Wait - maybe
> the correct term here is levy? I am a bit confused on the bond vs. levy
> thing.
>
> Another question you might be able to answer since we are on the subject of
> "construction." I understand the Trails have specified that a "security
> fence" be installed or agreed upon, before they "gift" a portion of their
> land. Will this cost of this security fence be included in this "bond" as
> "construction costs" or is it already figured into "summer monies" which I
> do not understand and do we have an estimated cost of what the Trails are
> asking for in regards of the security fence if we decide to put the HS on
> their land? Everything that I read or hear seems to be pointing in the
> direction of the new HS going on the Trail land as nothing else seems to be
> better.
>
> Phil Roderick
>
> -----Original message-----
> From: "keely emerinemix" kjajmix1 at msn.com
> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:56:50 -0700
> To: cjs at turbonet.com
> Subject: [Spam] RE: [Vision2020] supplemental bond/levy
>
> > A supplemental levy is a funding mechanism "levied" against property
> owners.
> > It may not include new construction or significant remodel, i.e.,
> capital
> > improvements. Moscow has a permanent supplemental levy at its current
> rate
> > due to the passage of several consecutive annual supplemental levies, a
> > provision granted by the State.
> >
> > A bond is a "levy" only in the sense that tax increases are "levied"
> against
> > owners of properties in the district. I would prefer that this issue be
> > referred to as a "bond" or bond election, but understand that bond levy
> is
> > what people call it. Either way, a bond cannot, by law, fund textbooks,
> > salaries, operations, routine maintenance, etc.; it can only fund capital
> > improvements.
> >
> > keely
> >
> >
> >
> > From: cjs <cjs at turbonet.com>
> > To: VISION2020 at MOSCOW.COM
> > Subject: [Vision2020] supplemental bond/levy
> > Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:20:28 -0700
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what a "supplemental bond/levy is? PLEASE!
> >
> > Phil Roderick
> >
> > _____________________________________________________
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
> > Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list