[Vision2020] Logical Error! Letter to the Editor: Teacher salary article
Dale Courtney
dale@courtneys.us
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:22:27 -0700
Ted wrote:
> I have discovered several logical errors in Dale's arguments
> regarding teacher pay.
Let's have at it!
> Dale asserts that teachers pay should be "annualized" to
> truly reflect what they could earn over the course of a full
> year as if two months of extra pay were tacked on to their
> yearly salary by dividing their salary by ten and multiplying
> this figure by 2 for the extra two months. But in fact if
> teachers are required to attend summer school during this
> "off" time, part of the requirements of their profession
> negates the possibility they could work full time during this
> "off" period, so in fact it is not correct to claim their
> salary must be annualized for a true estimate of their income
> compared to other professions.
They are not *required* to attend during school during that off time. They
can teach summer school, go on a 3 month cruise, or hand out carts at
Wal-Mart. It's up to them.
The point is -- it is an *opportunity* for them to earn extra money. Going
to school is one way that they can increase their pay.
> Also, Dale's referencing of the concept of "opportunity
> costs" is in some cases backwards from what it appears he
> intends to assert via the use of this concept. If a teacher
> must take summer school during the summer 2 month break from
> the regular school year as a requirement of their profession,
> and their next best alternative would be to work a well
> paying job during this 2 month period instead, the
> "opportunity cost" of summer school is in part the loss of
> the income that could have been generated by working during
> summer school.
No, they must *not* take classes. It is an opportunity to.
Please read up on what Opportunity Costs mean in the economic sense. It's
quite revealing: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/OpportunityCost.html
> Read the passage below and see the link Dale supplied on
> "opportunity costs"
> in regards to my arguments above.
You missed the boat because there is no mandatory thing that government
teachers *must* do during their summers off. That's what makes it a real
dream for their opportunities.
Best,
Dale