[Vision2020] Revisionist Workplace rules: Sexual harassment=sex

[Ted Moffett]

Tim et. al.

You speak as though you know with certainty what happened between Clinton 
and Paula Jones.  Why?
Did you see a video tape, or hear an audio tape, of the incident?  Do you 
know of any source that does have video or audio tapes of the incident?

Did you consult a psychic?

Paula Jones did have motivation to embellish her story.  And Clinton 
certainly had motivation to lie if he did truly harass Paula Jones.  I don't 
think either individual is a paragon of truth.

Your account of the ALLEGED sexual harassment is just a theory, one 
interpretation, though often repeated in the media.

As we slide down the proverbial slippery muddy slope of civil rights 
erosion, the ease with which people, based on repetitions of a story 
alleging unlawful conduct, fueled by powerful emotions of bias, come to 
believe such allegations are fact, without sufficient evidence, just makes 
the slope even steeper and muddier.

Ted



>From: Tim Lohrmann <timlohr@yahoo.com>
>To: vision2020@moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] Revisionist Workplace rules: Sexual harassment=sex
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Visionaries,
>      It's amazing really. Almost everyone who
>commented on my posts are in such denial that their
>blow dried slick willie could have been not exactly
>respectful of women.
>    Bob Hoffman's and Joan Opyr's last posts were  good
>examples.
>    So for one last time, Folks, when Bill committed
>perjury, he was NOT LYING ABOUT SEX or being a serial
>adulterer he was lying in a deposition after he had
>been named as the defendant in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT
>SUIT. If you consider alleged sexual harassment(in
>this case the chief exec. officer of a state sending
>Ark State Troopers out to summon a young woman who was
>in the employ of that state up to his room and
>exposing himself demanding sexual gratification) as
>comparable to just another sexual encounter then your
>views on rights of women in the workplace may come
>from the nineties--but the nineties of the last
>century.
>   That's why I brought this up. To point out the
>complete lack of principle in both parties. And how it
>is often transferred to the knee-jerk defenders of
>them. IF a GOP Pres. had been named in a sexual
>harassment suit the supposedly feminist minded
>Democrat party and their feminist allies would have
>been enraged and sputtering into any available
>microphone about what a pig he was.
>    BUT since he was who he was--linked to their own
>political futures--heard next to nothing from the
>demos and the feminists. Just as on this list, they
>said it was JUST ABOUT SEX.
>    Principles in present day two party politics? As an
>elderly neighbor of mine used to "they ain't got
>na'arn!"
>    Later, TL
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus