[CLC-Discussion] 713.346: Time to let Owners in on the party?

RPPTL CLC-Discussion clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Wed Oct 28 10:16:48 PDT 2020


I agree Robert. However, while we are on the subject, couldn't a similar end be achieved by the Legislature creating a private civil cause of action under 713.345 which currently creates criminal liability for a contractor who misapplies construction funds?   Over the past few years, I have had instances on behalf of both Owner clients and subcontractor clients where a private cause of action under 713.345 for a statutory violation would have been most useful.   When a contractor receives funds from an owner and doesn't pay subs and suppliers (with no good faith performance related basis to withhold payment), then both the owner and sub will be hurt.  It would be beneficial to see more civil teeth in the legislation.  I have gone the route of getting local law enforcement involved under 713.345 but it is a long and arduous process and very dependent on the quality and interest level of the agency having jurisdiction.

Michael Gibbons
Shareholder
215 N. Eola Dr. | Orlando, FL 32801
D: 407.418.6378 | P: 407.843.4600
Email<mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com> | Website<http://lowndes-law.com> | Bio<lowndes-law.com/people/Michael-Gibbons> | VCard<https://lowndeslaw.dpmlocal.com/admin/vcard/generate.php?id=64>

[cid:image001.png at 01D6AD2C.9638CF00]
LOCAL ROOTS. BROAD REACH. SM

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of RPPTL CLC-Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 12:55 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] 713.346: Time to let Owners in on the party?

CAUTION: THIS IS AN EXTERNAL EMAIL

Can anyone think of a compelling reason why 713.346 should not be amended to add a statutory cause of action (with a right to prevailing party fees) for an Owner who is harmed by a lienor's failure to pay a lower tier lienor?

And..... before anyone types it, yes, I know the owner should be getting all the proper releases in order to give themselves a proper payment defense but in my experience, far more than half of single family residential owners and most small commercial owners, do not get lien releases for progress payments or even final payments.  They usually do if a lender is involved, but not always.

[cid:image004.jpg at 01D6AD2C.40AC2C80]
Robert E. Doan
Board Certified Construction Attorney
Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator
231 N. Woodland Blvd.
DeLand, FL 32720
(P) 386-736-7700 | (F) 386-785-1549

Offices In Daytona Beach and DeLand

Website<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/lvvKCW6jPlh5ymqzF6rI2n/> | Bio<http://www.cobbcole.com/The-Cobb-Cole-Team/Robert-E-Doan.shtml> | vCard<http://www.cobbcole.com/content/includes/vCards/Robert-E-Doan.vcf>

This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.  For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20201028/ee56010b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4785 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20201028/ee56010b/image004-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2907 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20201028/ee56010b/image001-0001.png>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list