[WSBARP] Transfer on Death Deed with unequal beneficiary shares?

[Heather de Vrieze]

I would expect pushback from a title company, not the recorder. Frankly I find that title companies don’t really like these deeds and make it difficult for a beneficiary to sell property received via a TODD.

Heather

Heather S. de Vrieze
(she/her)
Attorney-at-Law
[cid:image001.jpg at 01DCA27D.7CAA75B0]
3909 California Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98116-3705
(206)938-5500
heatherd at westseattlelaw.com<mailto:heatherd at westseattlelaw.com>
www.westseattlelaw.com<http://www.westseattlelaw.com/>

Click here to connect with de Vrieze | Carney on Facebook:   [FB Logo] <https://www.facebook.com/DeVriezeCarney>

CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED. This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail message and any attachment.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Lynn Clare
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2026 3:06 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Transfer on Death Deed with unequal beneficiary shares?

I advise clients that if they want to do something unequal, we have to do a will. But I would be curious to hear if anyone has run into this on the other side?  Had a TODD with unequal shares either accepted or rejected by a county recorder?

Lynn Clare
Clare Law Firm


On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 2:58 PM Sara D. Longley <sara.longley at practus.com<mailto:sara.longley at practus.com>> wrote:
Hello listmates,

In my reading of the law on Transfer on Death Deeds, RCW 64.80.100(1)(c) states that concurrent beneficiaries receive equal and undivided shares with no right of survivorship, with the share of any predeceasing beneficiary being divided among the surviving beneficiaries pursuant to (1)(d).

However, more than once I have run across recorded TODDs that have concurrent beneficiaries receiving unequal shares.  I am looking at one right now that not only has unequal shares to each primary beneficiary, but also includes provisions for specific alternate beneficiaries for each primary beneficiary.

I have not (yet) been called on to assist with distributing any interests inherited via one of these defective TODDs, but I wonder if anyone has insight into the right way to handle this.  Better yet, if I am reading the statute incorrectly I would love to be set straight!

Thoughts?

Sara



Sara D. Longley  [http://www.practus.com/vcard/Files/enev.gif] <https://www.practus.com/vcard/Sara_Longley.vcf>
Associate
[Practus Logo]
[Phone]
(360) 378-4450 (Main Office)
[Phone]
(360) 468-7230 (Direct Dial)
[Email]
sara.longley at practus.com<mailto:sara.longley at practus.com>
[Biography]
My Bio<https://practus.com/attorney/sara-d-longley/>  |  Connect on LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/saradlongley/>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260220/16ac3d7b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17884 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260220/16ac3d7b/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18009 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260220/16ac3d7b/image002.png>