[WSBARP] Municipal violations for residential artificial turf installation (and subsequent fines and demands to remove)

[Stephen Crane]

If any of my fellow Listserver Members have had a case where a residential
property owner has been cited for installation of expensive artificial turf
(city ordinance prohibits more than 50% "lot coverage" and regards fake
grass as equivalent as concrete (despite superior drainage than real grass,
plus obvious water conservation), please let me know.
Also, wondering if the installer and/or manufacturer should know if the
jurisdiction where it is used restricts or limits use of artificial grass
before it puts it in.
It is my understanding that these municipal and even state restrictions are
growing more popular of late.
Thanks in advance for your responses.
Steve


*Stephen J. Crane*

*CRANE DUNHAM PLLC*

*3600 15th Ave West, Suite 200*

*Seattle, WA 98119 *

*phone: (206) 292-9090
<%28206%29%20292-9090>  email: scrane at cranedunham.com
<scrane at cranedunham.com>*

*fax: (206) 292-9736 <%28206%29%20292-9736>     web: www.cranedunham.com
<http://www.cranedunham.com/>*



*This e-mail may contain confidential information which is legally
privileged.  The information is solely for the use of the addressee named
above.  If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or other use of the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by
return e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20250327/8fa600b8/attachment.html>