[WSBARP] [WSBAPT] Advice on Revoking a POA

Mon Sep 12 14:31:29 PDT 2022

 I've gotten a court order revoking the PoA. You will need to contact all financial institutions and provide them with the court order. 
I had one of these and the annuity company would not put a hold on disbursing funds to the "bad" agent w/o a court order. (they said thatour written notice of revocation was insufficient to bar the "bad agent" from liquidating the annuities).
You also might want to start a VAPO and the court will order the Revocation based on your allegations of financial exploitation.
    On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 07:24:04 AM PDT, Dave Culbertson <dculbertson at culbertsonlawoffice.com> wrote:  

  <!--#yiv0451354901 _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv0451354901 #yiv0451354901 p.yiv0451354901MsoNormal, #yiv0451354901 li.yiv0451354901MsoNormal, #yiv0451354901 div.yiv0451354901MsoNormal {margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;}#yiv0451354901 a:link, #yiv0451354901 span.yiv0451354901MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0451354901 span.yiv0451354901EmailStyle202 {font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv0451354901 .yiv0451354901MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv0451354901 div.yiv0451354901WordSection1 {}#yiv0451354901 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv0451354901 ol {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv0451354901 ul {margin-bottom:0in;}-->
Hello, Listmates.

I have an older client I’ll be meeting with today. Her problem is that she gave a POA to someone she has begun to mistrust. Most likely she will want to create a new POA, in which we will specifically revoke the prior POA.

My question is about the practical need to prevent the existing POA from being used by the prior person unscrupulously to do harm. I am planning on providing the new POA to all potential dangers we are can identify (namely, banks as well as filing the new POA in the county land records). But how does one address the possibility of the prior person taking the existing POA and going to new businesses, banks, government agencies, etc and transacting unscrupulously in the name of the principal?

Best Regards,

Dave Culbertson

The Law Office of Davisson Culbertson

PO 20403

Seattle, WA 98102

Phone: (206) 478-8134

FAX: (866) 867-7796

dculbertson at culbertsonlawoffice.com

 ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20220912/2b6d33f9/attachment.html>