[WSBARP] Urgent question for u/d hearing

Kelby Derenick kelby at derenicklaw.com
Tue Jul 19 20:30:37 PDT 2022


Gwendolyn,

I am assuming the 90 day notice issued under RCW 59.18.650(2).  If so, at
the end of that statute, under section 6(a), it states that all notices
must be served as provided in RCW 59.12.040.  Under that statute, in
section (2), it states that if the person to be served is absent from the
premises, then serve on a person of suitable age and discretion AND mail
the notice addressed directly to the tenant to be served.

I could be going down the wrong path if it was a notice served not pursuant
to RCW 59.18.650.  I hope this helps.

Kelby J. Derenick
Attorney

*10018 Greenwood Ave. N*
*Seattle, WA 98133*
*Ph. (206) 659-5061*


*14 E. Main Street, Suite 207*
*Walla Walla, WA 99362*
*Ph: (509) 676-9805*

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This electronic mail message contains information
that (a) is or may be legally privileged, confidential, proprietary in
nature, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the Addressee(s) named herein. If you are not the
intended recipient, an addressee, or the person responsible for delivering
this to an addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, using, copying,
or distributing any part of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this electronic mail message in error, please contact me
immediately and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely
from your computer system.  Thank you.



On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:28 PM Gwendolyn Cornwell <Gwendolyn at glgmail.com>
wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> I have a u/d hearing on Thursday.  This afternoon the tenant’s attorney
> served and filed the answer, which throws everything at us.
>
> One of the defenses is that our 90-day notice, which included several
> named tenants and “All other occupants” was personally served on one of the
> unnamed tenants and therefore required mailing.
>
> I had the idea that mailing is only required if the notice is served on “a
> suitable person” who is not a tenant as well.  My question is, when serving
> multiple tenants, is it sufficient to serve one tenant with all copies, or
> does that require mailing as well?
>
> Is there anything to cite to on this?
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> Gwendolyn Cornwell
>
> Attorney
>
> Gourley Law Group
>
> 360-568-5065
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20220719/6b4defc8/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list