[WSBARP] Post-Divorce QCD Catch 22

John McCrady j.mccrady at pstitle.com
Fri Jul 30 15:58:38 PDT 2021


>From a title company perspective, any Washington Superior Court has jurisdiction over real estate in any county in Washington.  So a Lincoln County Decree of Dissolution which awards a Pierce County house to Wife has the effect of vesting that house in Wife without the necessity of a recorded deed.  Of course after the Lincoln County Dissolution, the client should keep a copy of the Decree of Dissolution handy for all future real estate transactions, since Pierce County Title Companies do not have direct access to instruments filed in Lincoln County Superior Court.
The main issue I run into is when the Decree of Dissolution does not clearly award the property to one party, or worse (in my mind) when the Decree recites something like "Husband will execute a deed to Wife....", which is un-necessary and seldom accomplished.

John McCrady
Counsel
Puget Sound Title Company
5350 Orchard Street West
University Place WA 98467
253-476-5721
j.mccrady at pstitle.com<mailto:j.mccrady at pstitle.com>
[Picture4]
Beginning July 26, 2021, recording fees for most documents recorded in Washington will increase by $100<https://www.piercecountywa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/105275/Recording-Fee-Schedule-Effective-Jul-25-2021->. Please be sure to collect recording fees accordingly. Due to the above increase, our Reconveyance fees will also be increased by $100.00

WARNING-FRAUDULENT FUNDING INSTRUCTIONS
Email hacking and fraud are on the rise to fraudulently misdirect funds.  Please call your escrow officer immediately using contact information found from an independent source, such as the sales contract or internet, to verify any funding instructions received.  We are not responsible for any wire sent by you to an incorrect bank account.


From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Ronald L. Coleman
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 2:47 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Post-Divorce QCD Catch 22

Return to court and get an order for formers spouse to sign, or if she/he refuses, court can appoint a commissioner to sign.

This is a good reason why it is always a best practice to record a deed (or require it) at the time of the decree.  Also, I have seen it where property is in a different county.  You need a deed for property in that county.

Ron

Ronald L. Coleman
Direct 253-238-5129 - rcoleman at dpearson.com<mailto:rcoleman at dpearson.com>
Davies Pearson, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
920 Fawcett Avenue / PO Box 1657, Tacoma, WA 98401
253-620-1500 | Fax 253-238-5158 | www.dpearson.com<https://f.xdref.com/?id=16ULrWEf027674&from=wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com&to=j.mccrady@pstitle.com&url=http://www.dpearson.com>
Download vCard<https://f.xdref.com/?id=16ULrWEf027674&from=wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com&to=j.mccrady@pstitle.com&url=http://www.dpearson.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Ronald_1584702.vcf> | View Profile<https://f.xdref.com/?id=16ULrWEf027674&from=wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com&to=j.mccrady@pstitle.com&url=http://www.dpearson.com/people/ronald-l-coleman>

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Patrick McDonald
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 12:45 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>; cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net<mailto:cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Post-Divorce QCD Catch 22

I agree with Joseph. The divorce decree should transfer title upon entry with the court and is a public record.

Patrick

_______________________
Pody & McDonald, PLLC
1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1410
Seattle, WA 98101-3106
T: 206-467-1559
F: 206-467-4489

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Joseph McIntosh
Sent: July 30, 2021 12:25 PM
To: cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net<mailto:cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net>; WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Post-Divorce QCD Catch 22

I would think the divorce decree, especially if recorded, would effectively evidence a transfer the real property so as to satisfy the lender's concerns.  I routinely encounter refinances following divorces where there was just a decree awarding the new borrower title, but no QCD.  I don't think the county recorder can prevent you from recording the court order.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Ryan P. Coon
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 12:02 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: [WSBARP] Post-Divorce QCD Catch 22


Listmates,

I've got a client needing to record a QCD to separate property post-divorce but is running into what seems to be a "catch 22" problem so I'm looking for some creative solutions.

Client by divorce decree is awarded the family home and thus needs to record a QCD from ex-spouse to separate the property. However, there is a large amount of outstanding property taxes due (several years worth) and the county (Island) is refusing to record the deed without the taxes being made current. Client doesn't have the funds to bring taxes current so is seeking a loan to pay the taxes. However, client is having trouble procuring a loan because the bank is requiring signature of ex-spouse since ex-spouse's name is on the property but ex-spouse will not sign off on the loan.

Thus, client can't record a QCD because they don't have the money to pay the taxes but their having trouble getting the money to pay the taxes without first recording the QCD.

Any thoughts or creative work-arounds for this would be much appreciated, thank you.
--

Very Truly Yours,
Ryan P. Coon
Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.

10101 - 270th St. NW
Stanwood, WA 98292
(360) 629-2900 (Telephone)
(360) 629-0220 (Fax)

This message contains confidential and privileged information that is intended only for the named recipient(s).  Unless you are the named recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading, copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information.  If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.


This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (800) 439-1112, and destroy all copies of the original message.

IRS regulations require us to advise you that, unless otherwise specifically noted, any federal tax advice in this communication (including any attachments, enclosures, or other accompanying materials) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties; furthermore, this communication was not intended or written to support the promotion or marketing of any of the transactions or matters it addresses. Please call us for additional information.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210730/c59b1baa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11867 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210730/c59b1baa/image001.jpg>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list