[WSBARP] Ejectment vs Eviction under moratorium

Roger Hawkes Roger at law-hawks.com
Wed Feb 10 14:47:41 PST 2021


Be aware the county court system where property is located may very well have placed its own restrictions on such actions.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Timothy Lehr
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:26 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBARP] Ejectment vs Eviction under moratorium

All,

Has anyone successfully pursued an ejectment action under the moratorium vs an eviction? I have a couple cases where an ejectment seems proper vs an eviction as there is no LL/T relationship.

Case 1 - PC allowed occupant to stay in a manufactured home on his property a few years ago. No rent exchanged. PC wanted to "help" the occupant during rough times, but now occupant is refusing to leave and causing other types of problems. PC is selling the manufactured home and a 60-Day notice was properly served with affidavit and purchase agreement signed by buyer. I would love to file eviction under RLLTA and cite "Intent to Sell" exception to moratorium to speed things up, but I believe this is more of an ejectment situation and don't want to get to a hearing and get it tossed out.

Case 2- PC purchased home at foreclosure sale. Previous owner is now refusing to vacate. The sheriff already told PC they can't help and to get attorney. I haven't determined yet whether PC is planning to "occupy" the property or not. If he does wish to occupy, we serve 60-Day with attachments and we're in the same scenario as Case 1, ejectment vs eviction. If he doesn't intend to occupy, can we move forward with ejectment action under the moratorium where none of the exceptions are present? If not, it seems property owners have ZERO recourse in the event of a squatter on their property without the presence of exceptions...? That seems wild to me, but par for the course with this moratorium.

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

Timothy C. Lehr
Attorney at Law

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D6FFBB.AE037E00]

p:   360.855.0131
e:   timothy at stileslaw.com<mailto:timothy at stileslaw.com>
w:  www.stileslaw.com<http://www.stileslaw.com/>

NOTICE: The information contained in this email is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to : (i) delete the email and all copies; (ii) not disclose, distribute or use the email in any manner; (iii) notify the sender immediately. Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210210/471213ff/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5083 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210210/471213ff/image001.jpg>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list