[WSBARP] Judgment Establishing Boundary by Recorded Survey.

[Jeff Davis]

Parties to a boundary dispute want to settle by entry of a court order
saying the boundary between their respective properties is as set forth in a
recorded survey.  One party insists that, in the Judgment Summary, both
parties be listed as both judgment debtors and creditors.  Have any of you,
in settling  litigated boundary issues, used that kind of language in the
order?  I don't see why the order just can't refer to the two parcels and
then say the recorded survey sets forth the correct boundary.  

 

Jeff

 

W. Jeff Davis, Esq.

BELL & DAVIS PLLC
P.O. Box 510
Sequim WA 98382
Phone No.:(360) 683.1129 
Fax No.: (360) 683.1258 
email:  <mailto:info at bellanddavispllc.com> info at bellanddavispllc.com
 <http://www.bellanddavispllc.com/> www.bellanddavispllc.com
 
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged,
confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in
error, please e-mail the sender at  <mailto:info at bellanddavispllc.com>
info at bellanddavispllc.com  or call 360.683.1129

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210205/91a7a2ea/attachment.html>