[WSBARP] Recording Standards Commission

[Sullivan, Brett]

Chris, thank you very much for your work on this commission.

My firm is preparing a spreadsheet to gather input from all of our team
members who work with recordings. This will help organize our thoughts for
you.

Thanks again.

*Brett T. Sullivan*
Attorney at Law

*Lucent Law, PLLC <https://lucentlaw.com>*
*South Hill Office*
1403 S. Grand Blvd., Suite 201-S
Spokane, WA  99203-2278

P: (509) 455-3713
D: (509) 828-4642
F: (509) 455-3718
E: brett at lucentlaw.com

LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/brettsullivanspokane>
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/lucentlaw>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are confidential and
may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
be aware that any disclosure, copying or distribution, or use of this email
or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please notify me by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from
your system.



On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 10:18 AM Chris B <chrisb at firstavenuelaw.com> wrote:

> RCW 65.24.040 established a new entity, known as the Recording Standards
> Commission (RSC).  Its purpose, per that statute is:
>
>
>
> *The Recording Standards Commission is intended to clarify existing laws
> regarding the recording of documents with county recording departments and
> county auditors. Recording standards and practices vary from county to
> county which creates confusion and liability. Simplified and standardized
> recording standards and fees are therefore needed to better harmonize
> practices throughout the state.*
>
>
>
> The 13 members of the commission are mostly county auditors, as well as a
> representative from the Washington Mortgage Bankers Assn, Escrow
> Association of Washington and Washington Land Title Association.  One seat
> was also set aside for a member of the WSBA.  I was nominated and approved
> to represent WSBA.
>
>
>
> The Commission held its first meeting yesterday, with the attachment as
> its starting point re: issues to work on.  As you can see, most of the
> issues are technical in nature as to how the various recorder’s/auditor’s
> offices work.
>
>
>
> I want to bring to the RSC all of your various gripes about county
> recorders/auditors offices.  One thing I have learned already is that these
> offices consider themselves entirely separate (and mostly with no
> accountability) on issues from the DOR relating to REET.  However, I am
> pushing for them to at least become aware of these sorts of issues from
> practitioners.  So (at the risk of blowing up my email in-box), I invite
> all member of the WSBA Real Property section to email me your issues and
> concerns with various recording offices.  Please identify which county
> office you are writing about when you respond.
>
>
>
> I have a one year appointment to the RSC, so please bookmark my contact
> info.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Please note our new website and email address as of 1/1/21.*
>
>
>
> Chris Benis
>
> First Avenue Law Group, PLLC
>
> 321 First Avenue West, Seattle, WA  98119
>
> 206.447-1900 office – 206.447.9075 fax – www. firstavenuelaw.com
>
>
>
> This message contains information that may be CONFIDENTIAL AND
> PRIVILEGED.  Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the
> addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
> information contained in the message.  If you have received the message in
> error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail chrisb at firstavenuelaw.com,
> and delete this message. Thank you very much.
>
>
>
> To comply with recent IRS rules, we must inform you that this message, if
> it contains advice relating to federal taxes, was not intended or written
> to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties
> that may be imposed under federal tax law.  Under recent IRS rules, a
> taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties
> only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that
> conforms to stringent requirements under federal law.  Please contact me if
> you would like to discuss our preparation of an opinion that conforms to
> these new rules.
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20211203/77230359/attachment.html>