[WSBARP] Ejectment v. unlawful detainer

[Kaitlyn Jackson]

I’d use a UD action because they are a co-tenant. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 24, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Peter Crocker <peterecrocker at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Listmates,
> Apologies for double posting. 
> A person is expressly authorized to live in a rental property, having been named, and delineated as a "Tenant," in a lease, but the person hasn't actually signed the lease. If that person's co-tenant who actually signed the lease moved out, and the non-signer remained, and the landlord was forced to remove the non-signer through the courts, would the landlord be stuck with an ejection action, or would they have access to unlawful detainer?
> Sincerely, 
> Peter
> 
> Law Office of Peter Crocker, PLLC
> 210 Polk St., Ste. 6A
> Port Townsend, WA 98368
> peter at petercrockerlaw.com 
> 360-344-8474
> 
> *** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and destroy the copy you received.***
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp

-- 
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This e-mail (including any attachments) is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may 
contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the 
intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept 
this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic 
Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, 
imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; 
return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper 
and electronic copies. Any settlement offer contained herein is made 
pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on 
the part of this firm’s client(s) or its agents.  IRS CIRCULAR 230 
DISCLAIMER:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I 
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication 
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and 
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the 
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to 
another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210424/bbef3324/attachment.html>