[WSBARP] Background of Need for Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit

[Kary Krismer]

The requirement of a real estate excise tax affidavit isn't all that 
bad.  By analogy you have to file an income tax return even if you don't 
owe any tax.  The alternative for deed recording and REET is training 
staff on every possible exception to REET, which seems problematic for 
many reasons.

It's the $10 fee that is objectionable.  You're basically paying $10 to 
make the government's job easier (or where REET is due to pay the REET).

Next they'll start charging $10 for the abbreviated legal description.  
/sarc

Kary L. Krismer

206 723-2148

On 4/2/2021 3:40 PM, Dwight Bickel wrote:
>
> The lawyers mostly did not perceive the extent of change when the 
> Dept. of Revenue expanded the affidavit requirement of WAC 
> 458-61A-303. The objection of Washington Land Title Ass’n was the only 
> public comment.
>
> The DOR position and interpretation is simple. There should be an 
> excise tax affidavit for every change of ownership of real property. 
> Changes by operation of law (like inheritance), changes due to court 
> orders (like partition, divorce, quiet title, probate) and changes due 
> to transfers of ownership (like mergers and distributions), which 
> previously did not require recording, usually were exempt from the 
> real estate sales tax, now require an excise tax affidavit.
>
> Another Dept. of Revenue change was accomplished without objection by 
> the Bar when DOR changed RCW 82.45.197 to require excise tax to be 
> paid if there was not a specific WAC stating it was exempt. That 
> change allowed the Grant County Treasurer to charge that sales tax for 
> property inherited without a probate. Though a statute exempted 
> inheritance, the WAC only allowed an exemption with documentation from 
> a probate. He testified at the Legislature that every transfer of 
> ownership due to death legally requires a probate. I was there to 
> disagree, but lost every public debate. He collected from many heirs; 
> often massive taxes due to the value of agricultural land. A 2016 
> change sponsored by the Washington Land Title Ass’n fixed that 
> incorrect interpretation.
>
> That is why we now have to have affidavits and $10 fees though such 
> transfers are not taxable sales, and we now have to record documents 
> about such changes of ownership.
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210403/3d478bf0/attachment.html>