[WSBARP] foreclosure vs deed in lieu

Jim Doran jim at doranlegal.com
Fri Sep 25 07:31:39 PDT 2020


On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 3:45 PM Kate Love <KateL at law-hawks.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> The lights are on but no one is home.  You are wasting your time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> undereducated and undertrained and undersupervised staff)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ​and underpaid - trust me on this 😉
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kate F. Love
>
>
>
>
> WSBA No. 51314
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hawkes Law Firm P.S.
>
>
>
>
> main line 206 367 5000
>
>
> fax line    206 367 4005
>
>
> katel at law-hawks.com
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/19944+Ballinger+Way+NE+Ste+%23100+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shoreline,+WA+98155?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/19944+Ballinger+Way+NE+Ste+%23100+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shoreline,+WA+98155?entry=gmail&source=g>
> www.hawkeslawcenter.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 19944 Ballinger Way NE Ste #100
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/19944+Ballinger+Way+NE+Ste+%23100+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shoreline,+WA+98155?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> Shoreline, WA 98155
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/19944+Ballinger+Way+NE+Ste+%23100+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shoreline,+WA+98155?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *NOTICE:  The information contained in this email may be confidential
> and/or legally privileged.  It has been sent for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s).  If the reader of this message is not an intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication,
> or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
> communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of rob at hctc.com <rob at hctc.com
> >
>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2020 10:26 AM
>
>
> *To:* 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>;
> cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net <cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] foreclosure vs deed in lieu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rick is of course right as always, but my experiences – including
> successful litigation with this as the centerpiece with a six figure result
> – is that most of the larger banks (usually through their
>
> undereducated and undertrained and undersupervised staff) often just
> don’t have any idea what they are doing. They have certain boxes, and if
> something
>
> doesn’t fit in a box, then they just can’t deal with it. A retiring Wells
> Fargo regional administrator who was responsible for these things explained
> this to me when I was really frustrated about a different case. Smaller
> banks, like the one Rick was a director
>
> for, pay attention. Larger banks, not so much.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rick’s bank used a sharp carving knife. Big banks use a dull chainsaw for
> the same cuts.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Recall all of the times in the fairly recent past when a very large bank
> has been fined a huge amount of money for greed and incompetence.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sure, they can say they are worried about all sorts of things, but a title
> guaranty belies those worries. Try offering them an indemnification – they
> usually won’t even accept that.  My view is unfortunately cynical, but based
>
> on much experience. How can they not make money, especially in today’s
> markets, on deeds in lieu, if they are reasonably careful, as a general
> policy, over foreclosures often delayed by years by their own
> inefficiencies?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think I should retire.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/236+West+Birch+Street+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shelton,+WA+98584?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/236+West+Birch+Street+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shelton,+WA+98584?entry=gmail&source=g>Robert
> D. Wilson-Hoss
>
>
>
>
> Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP
>
>
>
>
> 236 West Birch Street
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/236+West+Birch+Street+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shelton,+WA+98584?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> Shelton, WA 98584
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/236+West+Birch+Street+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Shelton,+WA+98584?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> 360 426-2999
>
>
>
>
> www.hossandwilson-hoss.com
>
>
>
>
> rob at hctc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may
> contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are
> hereby
>
> notified that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is
> strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify
> us by reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed
> above) and immediately delete this message
>
> and any and all of its attachments.  Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>
> *On Behalf Of *Rick Hoss
>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2020 9:15 AM
>
>
> *To:* cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net; 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <
> wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] foreclosure vs deed in lieu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Lenders make foreclosure decisions for many reasons.  Each bank carefully
> monitors and categorizes non-performing loans, defaulted loans, loans in
> foreclosure and other real estate owned.
>
> The number of loans in each of these 4 category is measured every month.
> Sometimes decisions are made based on timing, and you can get a
> different answer before or after the next regulatory exam or accounting
> period.
>
>
>
>
> What if the bank holds too much foreclosed property  (they call other real
> estate owned) and they have an exam or audit next month?  Sometimes banks
> prefer a trustee sale or sheriff sale
>
> if they think a cash buyer is likely. What if the bank needs to realize,
> or defer, the loss for accounting purposes? What if the decision maker like
> a bank branch manager gets a bonus if the branch other real estate owned
> drops to a certain level? Sometimes
>
> servicers spend their foreclosure budget before year end. Some banks don't
> realize they can take a non-merger deed in lieu and reserve the right to
> foreclose any later discovered liens not disclosed in the trustee sale or
> litigation guaranty title reports.
>
> Sometimes banks listen to lawyers who have limited experience.
>
>
>
>
> If a lender does take a deed in lieu they require a written agreement -
> you may get a different answer by proposing a lender friendly agreement
> with the PR listing the facts in a signed
>
> Declaration. From an old bank director and lawyer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*
>
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>
> *On Behalf Of *Robert R. Cole
>
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:31 PM
>
>
> *To:* WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>
>
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] foreclosure vs deed in lieu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Can someone tell me why Lenders don't take a deed in lieu, especially
> after Borrower's death, even when there is no other loan, and a PR willing
> to give it, and no Medicaid to be reimbursed?  It has happened to me
> numerous times.  Is it due to insurance
>
> issues or other back office matters???  What are they afraid of?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Very Truly Yours,
>
>
>
>
> Robert R. Cole
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/10101+-+270th+St.+NW++%0D%0A+%0D%0AStanwood,+WA+98292?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
> Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 10101 - 270th St. NW
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/10101+-+270th+St.+NW++%0D%0A+%0D%0AStanwood,+WA+98292?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> Stanwood, WA 98292
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/10101+-+270th+St.+NW++%0D%0A+%0D%0AStanwood,+WA+98292?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> (360) 629-2900 (Telephone)
>
>
>
>
> (360) 629-0220 (Fax)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message contains confidential and privileged information that is
> intended only for the named recipient(s).  Unless you are the named
> recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading,
> copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating
>
> such information.  If you receive this communication in error, please
> notify the sender immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> WSBARP mailing list
>
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
>
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp

-- 
James R. Doran
Attorney at Law
100 E. Pine Street -  Suite 205
Bellingham, WA 98225
(360)393-9506
jim at doranlegal.com
www.doranlegal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200925/b3e6899a/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list