[WSBARP] SFR Definition Include a Guest Cottage?

[Craig Gourley]

Hi Paul, I fought this battle with Cross Valley water and their position was separate structure is a separate user and you pay for a new service. It has been several years ago but in the end the client paid. There is some interesting commentary coming out dealing with rentals and defining SFR zoning as it pertains to unrelated parties living together.  You might find something in that lkne of research.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Paul Neumiller <pneumiller at hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:03:19 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] SFR Definition Include a Guest Cottage?

Listmates, after rummaging around CaseMaker for a few hours, I am turning to the hivemind.  I have a client living in a house with a water system agreement saying each hook-up is for "normal household purposes of the occupants of a maximum of one single-family residence on each benefited property."   The client wants to build a "guest cottage" on the client's property and, upon initial review, appears able to do so under local county zoning rules (single parcel, less than 1000 sq. ft, single driveway, etc.)  Client would like to expand use of water to include the guest cottage without having to ask other "water users" for permission to build the guest house or to modify the water agreement to allow water to the guest house.  Is there any ruling or case out there that says that the definition of a "single family residence" includes all legal out-buildings, accessory buildings, and/or, !!!,  guest cottages?




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200915/bac3d6e0/attachment.html>