[WSBARP] Question about Sound Transit "taking" property in West Seattle

Kary Krismer Krismer at comcast.net
Fri Jan 18 11:19:54 PST 2019


I've dealt with this a few times, both as an attorney and an agent.  It 
may vary depending on federal or state, but besides the FMV of the 
property there may be other benefits, including moving costs and 
possibly helping to fix up a replacement house that needs some work.  
One a few decades ago they would even pay over FMV if there was nothing 
else in the area that could be purchased for FMV.

More recently the offer they were making on a client's property was so 
good that we couldn't begin to provide any comps that would have 
provided additional value.  They were 10-20% over value.  But yes, we 
could have fought.

And yes I believe you can even end up in litigation.  When I was about 
12 years old my parents had some property Bremerton wanted to take, and 
they were trying to avoid service.  I remember running into the process 
server after a friend had an unfortunate experience with a peat bog, and 
being covered from head to toe in peat moss looked more like he had an 
unfortunate incident with a septic tank.

(Septic tank comment added so that people feel they are getting their 
$25 worth.)

Kary L. Krismer
John L. Scott/KMS Renton
206 723-2148

On 1/18/2019 10:32 AM, Kaitlyn Jackson wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> Looking for someone to help provide me the lay of the land when it 
> comes down to the process of walking a client through a government 
> taking. My PC has residential land and an undeveloped land zoned for 
> multifamily use (I think it's LR2??) in West Seattle. Sound Transit 
> seems to be set on expanding a new transit area on this property and 
> my PC knows they have to pay FMV but wants to know 1. How that's 
> determined and 2. How they can fight it for increase or negotiate?
>
> Anyone willing to help provide me with a road map?
>
> -- 
> Thank you,*
> *
>
> Kaitlyn R. Jackson|Attorney|DIMENSIONLAWGROUPPLLC
> 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
> t:_206.973.3500_| 
> f:_206.577.5090_|e:_kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com_|www.dimensionlaw.com 
> <http://www.dimensionlaw.com/>
>
> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:This e-mail (including any attachments) is 
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and 
> may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it 
> to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. 
> Attempts to intercept this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) 
> of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the 
> interceptor to fines, imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have 
> received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, 
> facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address 
> below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies. Any settlement 
> offer contained herein is made pursuant to Washington ER 408, and 
> without admitting fault or liability on the part of this firm’s 
> client(s) or its agents.IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER:To ensure 
> compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I inform you that any 
> U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any 
> attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be 
> used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
> Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another 
> party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190118/217e3ba3/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list