[WSBARP] Waste Statute of Limitations- Exceptions

[Dave B]

Naturally I would argue the latter, but that also seems to be the case from
what I've found so far regarding timber trespass. It would seem
inappropriate a developer is allowed to knowingly commit waste on adjacent
properties and simply hope no one notices for three years. Thanks for the
reply.

Dave

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:24 PM Douglas Scott <doug at rainieradvocates.com>
wrote:

> Your legal question is:   did the requisite statute of limitations occur
> when the trees were cut or did it start upon the discovery or when a
> discovery should have reasonably been made? The answer would require some
> research.
> *DOUGLAS W. SCOTT*
> Rainier Legal Advocates|LLC
>
> *Eastside Office*
> 465 Rainier Blvd. N., Suite C | Issaquah, Washington 98027 | 425.392.8550
> (tel) | 425.392.2829 (fax)
>
> *Seattle Office*
> 12055 15th Ave NE | Seattle, Washington 98125 | 206.552.0785 (tel)
>
> www.rainieradvocates.com f/k/a
> www.davisscottlaw.com
>
> Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain
> information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or
> other privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be
> conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of
> this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of
> the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended
> recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly
> delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in
> any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or
> reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may
> be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not
> a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:32 AM Dave B <bmcdave85 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello, I came across this list and was hoping I could impose for some
>> opinions. I'm a homeowner in Snohomish County and have been doing research
>> for a dispute I'm having with a neighbor. As a result I've discovered waste
>> was committed on my property by the developer of several properties
>> adjacent to mine, they removed several significant boundary trees I was
>> previously unaware were on my property. I've found the site condition maps
>> done at the time that clearly document the tree locations, but the removal
>> occurred about 5 years ago. I'm wondering if I would still have an
>> opportunity to bring action against the developer since I've only just
>> discovered the injury? Thank you.
>>
>> Dave
>> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
>> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
>> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
>> others.***
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WSBARP mailing list
>> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
>> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190211/c5fed85f/attachment.html>