[WSBARP] PC looking for referral

[Douglas W. Scott]

I encountered one of these in which an attorney sought to protect the attorney fees of his divorcing client  by a note and DOT against the marital house.  The Judge threw out the DOT since it was only signed by the wife.  There are other documents which the Guy could have prepared to protect his advance funds prior to the house being sold.

Douglas W. Scott
Rainier Legal Advocates, LLC
465 Rainier Boulevard North, Suite C
Issaquah, Washington, 98027
V.  425.392.8550
F.  425-392-2829
www.rainieradvocates.com<http://www.rainieradvocates.com> f/k/a
www.davisscottlaw.com<http://www.davisscottlaw.com/>


From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Craig Blackmon
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 3:00 PM
To: WSBA Real Property List Serve
Subject: [WSBARP] PC looking for referral

'Mates, here is the potential matter in a very small nutshell:

PC is financially helping a Guy (G) in a nasty dissolution action. G has signed a promissory note for the funds advanced, secured by a DOT on the still-marital home. The DOT was signed by G only and not Spouse. S has now sued seeking to set aside that DOT. PC wants to protect his security interest.

Anyone interested? This matter is beyond my scope of practice and I am sure there are others who can quickly and efficiently get on board. I will forward replies received here.

Craig
Craig Blackmon, Attorney at Law
Seattle Real Estate Lawyer<http://www.seattlepropertylawyer.com/>
92 Lenora St. (The Makers Space, a shared work environment)
Seattle WA 98121
Office/Cell: (206) 369-5949   Fax: (206) 770-7328
@LawyerBroker<https://twitter.com/LawyerBroker>
How to Buy Without an Agent<http://www.seattlepropertylawyer.com/blog?category=Buy+without+an+Agent> | How to Sell FSBO<http://www.seattlepropertylawyer.com/blog?category=Sell+FSBO> | RE Glossary<http://www.seattlepropertylawyer.com/blog?category=Real+Estate+Glossary>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is a private, confidential electronic communication encompassed by 18 USC 2510. It is for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of its confidential or privileged nature.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender and destroy all copies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20181002/b07621b4/attachment.html>