[WSBARP] quiet title REET

[Bickel, Dwight]

Paul is correct.  The Superior Court Judgment is a public record. No need to record it in the same County.


On Aug 3, 2018, at 9:23 PM, Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com<mailto:craig at glgmail.com>> wrote:

IMPORTANT NOTICE - This message sourced from an external mail server outside of the Company.
We always record a certified copy of the judgment with the Auditor.  Maybe its redundant but we have always done it that way to assure it is entered into the chain of title and the Assessor is notified.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Paul Neumiller <pneumiller at hotmail.com<mailto:pneumiller at hotmail.com>>
Date: 8/3/18 7:24 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] quiet title REET


If in the same County, why are you recording a judgment for adverse possession?  I hope the title people chime in here but I thought the judgment being in the court house records was enough for the title companies to recognize it.  Isn't recording a judgment in the same county as the judgment redundant?


________________________________
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> on behalf of Stephen A. Brandli <steve at brandlilaw.com<mailto:steve at brandlilaw.com>>
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 2:01 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv'
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] quiet title REET


I asked the Treasurer’s Office here in San Juan County to research this when I was recording an adverse possession judgment.  No REET affidavit required.



                Steve



From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Mary Stone
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 1:24 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] quiet title REET





Hmmm, I just recorded one without a REET.



From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Matt Johnson
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 11:38 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Cc: Stefanie Valencia <Stefanie at gravislaw.com<mailto:Stefanie at gravislaw.com>>
Subject: [WSBARP] quiet title REET



I have a judgment quieting title after default where Defendant failed to appear.



I need to complete the REET, but I have no grantor to signoff.



In this instance, with judgment attached, can I sign as agent because I am acting in some degree as agent of the Court?



How do you complete REETs in this scenario?



Matthew R. Johnson | Attorney at Law

Schedule an Appointment<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgravislaw.acuityscheduling.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C83df913c578c464f58dc08d5f985154c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636689272342924582&sdata=yF%2BEo56Am6kFandrsQ6n9N1YBu8QOd8VlcepLJj6IR0%3D&reserved=0>

Partner - Gravis Law, PLLC

P.O. Box 182 | 350 E. Main St.

Dayton, WA 99328

O-(509) 382-2030

F-(866) 419-9269
Website <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravislaw.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C83df913c578c464f58dc08d5f985154c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636689272342924582&sdata=mKPtnn%2B%2FuYIxIEF6kOakTz1tR0HLcESLvox719r15LE%3D&reserved=0> - LinkedIn<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fpub%2Fmatthew-r-johnson%2F2b%2F997%2F87a&data=02%7C01%7C%7C83df913c578c464f58dc08d5f985154c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636689272342924582&sdata=%2F7wnrO9I52OIq9EN%2FD7UwtaxNNjl9KT52veiL6efO34%3D&reserved=0>





NOTICE:  This email (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (EPCA), 18 U.S.C., Sec. 2510 - 2522, is confidential and privileged.  This email is solely for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.  Receipt by anyone other than the individual recipient(s) is NOT a waiver of attorney-client privilege.  Any violation of the ECPA is subject to the penalties stated therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify me immediately by reply e-mail to matt at gravislaw.com<mailto:matt at gravislaw.com> and immediately delete the original message.



_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
________________________________
NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180806/df75121e/attachment.html>