[WSBARP] Question

[Scott Thomas]

Some of the typical issues with a sewer line easement (which may, or may
not be applicable to your client's particular circumstances) are (1) who is
obligated to repair the sewer line when repairs are necessary; (2) how
difficult (costly) is it going to be to repair the line (i.e., is burdened
property going to put a huge rock wall or some other obstruction over the
line, making repairs more costly than usual, or is the easement so narrow
that it is not possible to get equipment in to make a repair to the
line?)); (3) is your client adequately protected from a contractor filing a
mechanic's lien in the event contractor is not paid for constructing a
sewer that benefits client's property; (4) is your client able to expand
the use of sewer line if client decides at a future date to increase use of
the line (by converting a single family residence to a multi-family
development, for example); does the agreement make clear that your client
is not obligated any connection fees to the sewer authority.  At least,
these are the issues I have run into in the past.  I am sure there are
others I have not thought of.

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Sangeeta Saigal <
attorney at sangeetasaigal.com> wrote:

> Good All,
>
>
>
> Any advice on the following issue would be greatly appreciated:
>
>
>
> Property A’s sewer line runs through Property B.  Property B wants to
> modify the sewer line easement and relocate the sewer line connection
> within its property due to new construction project.  Property B is asking
> Property A to sign a Sewer Easement Modification Agreement.
>
>
>
> Any concerns with signing this?  Any issues to be aware of prior to
> signature?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Sangeeta
>
>
>
> With Warm Regards,
>
> Sangeeta Saigal
> Attorney at Law, PLLC
> Phone: 425.698-9828 <(425)%20698-9828>
>
> Fax: 425-968-9837 <(425)%20968-9837>
> Website: http://www.sangeetasaigal.com
>
>  IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments,
> contains information that may be confidential, and may also be
> protected by attorney client privilege or work product doctrine. It is
> intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at
> attorney at sangeetasaigal.com and delete this message. You are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message
> is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this e-mail, including any
> attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. To comply
> with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax
> issues in this email is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
> be used by you, (a) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal
> Revenue Code or (b) to promote, market, or recommend to another party
> any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/01146ecc/attachment.html>