[WSBARP] Sheriff Indemnity Bonds

[NC]

Contact Parker Smith and Feek as they may provide this faster. There is a
great discussion of this by Matthew Green at Williams Kastner in a Dec.
2014 WSBA CLE

On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Danielle Flatt <danielle at dimensionlaw.com> wrote:

> Questions for Listmates who do post-foreclosure UDs and commercial UDs:
>
> Recently, the sheriff departments we've been working with have arrived at
> the property to do the eviction, and requiring the client provide a rider
> to increase the amount of the indemnity bond.
>
> In our experience, the process of obtaining the rider takes 1-2 hours.
> For some reason, the deputies my clients have been assigned think it's a 5
> minute process, and then get angry with my client as to why they don't have
> an instantaneous rider.
>
> So this makes me wonder,
> 1) How often are you asked to provide a rider (and does it happen in some
> counties more than others)?
> 2) How fast are your bonding companies able to approve that rider?
> 3) Which bonding companies are you using? (Because we may decide to switch
> to a company that can give us a faster turnaround).
>
> Thanks for your insight!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> DANIELLE FLATT | ATTORNEY | DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
> 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
> t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *danielle at dimensionlaw.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','danielle at dimensionlaw.com');>*|
> www.dimensionlaw.com
>
>
>
> **PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW OFFICE ADDRESS**
>
>
> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This e-mail (including any attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may
> contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
> intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept
> this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic
> Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines,
> imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone;
> return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper
> and electronic copies. Any settlement offer contained herein is made
> pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on
> the part of this firm’s client(s) or its agents.  IRS CIRCULAR 230
> DISCLAIMER:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I
> inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
> (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
> cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
> another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
>


-- 
Nicholas L. Clapham
(206)939-0262

NOTICE- This email message may contain confidential and privileged
information. It is intended only for the named recipent(s) and may contain
attorney work product and/or information exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized use is prohibited.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message. This does not constitute an electronic
signature.

Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230 and other IRS
regulations, unless we expressly state otherwise, any tax advice contained
in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax-related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or matter(s) addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170706/e5f610a1/attachment.html>