[WSBARP] Tenancy-in-common agreement to run with the land?

[David Faber]

Thanks for your thoughts. I agree with your suggestion, Andrew. Regarding
your suggestion, Jeanne: PC doesn't want to go through the process of the
BLA right now, so that's why we aren't talking about doing a BLA. It's an
expensive and time-consuming process.

Best,
David J. Faber
Faber Feinson PLLC
210 Polk Street, Suite 1
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 379-4110

*** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.
This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that
you have received this communication in error, please do not print,
copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also,
please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in
error, and destroy the copy you received.***

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jeanne Dawes <jjdawes at goregrewe.com>
wrote:

> How about doing the BLA, and then create an easement for which the intend
> to use the land.
>
>
>
> *Jeanne*
>
>
>
> *Jeanne J.* *Dawes*
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> Gore & Grewe, P.S.
>
> 103 E. Indiana Avenue, Suite A
>
> Spokane, WA 99207-2317
>
> Voice:  509-326-7500
>
> Fax:      509-326-7503
>
> jjdawes at goregrewe.com
>
> INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL TRANSMISSION IS PRIVILEGED AND
> CONFIDENTIAL.
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] *On Behalf Of *David Faber
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:43 AM
> *To:* wsbarp <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Tenancy-in-common agreement to run with the land?
>
>
>
> PC came into my office on the recommendation of a title officer during the
> course of a rather unorthodox property purchase. PC and neighbor are
> jointly purchasing a rectangular lot lying directly between their existing
> properties. PC and neighbor have decided that going through the boundary
> line adjustment process. The title officer suggested that wouldn't be a
> problem, that they should come see me, and that I would just need to make
> sure that if either of the parties sells their ownership in their primary
> parcel that their interest in the "community lot" would pass with it. My
> gut reaction was to create a tenancy-in-common agreement, but I would need
> to make sure that it runs with the land of the neighboring parcels. I don't
> see any reason why I couldn't draft that language, but I just want to make
> sure that I don't miss anything. Has anyone experienced a similar situation
> and/or have a "best practice" solution (other than "tell the PC to go ahead
> and do the boundary line adjustment; it will be better for them in the long
> run" because I already know that and they told me "no thanks")?
>
>
> Best,
>
> David J. Faber
>
> Faber Feinson PLLC
>
> 210 Polk Street, Suite 1
>
> Port Townsend, WA 98368
> (360) 379-4110
>
>
>
> *** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.
> This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that
> you have received this communication in error, please do not print,
> copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also,
> please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in
> error, and destroy the copy you received.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20160526/e60ebdff/attachment.html>