[WSBARP] Tenancy-in-common agreement to run with the land?

Jeanne Dawes jjdawes at goregrewe.com
Thu May 26 10:59:30 PDT 2016


How about doing the BLA, and then create an easement for which the intend to use the land.

Jeanne

Jeanne J. Dawes
Attorney at Law
Gore & Grewe, P.S.
103 E. Indiana Avenue, Suite A
Spokane, WA 99207-2317
Voice:  509-326-7500
Fax:      509-326-7503
jjdawes at goregrewe.com<mailto:jjdawes at goregrewe.com>
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL TRANSMISSION IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of David Faber
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:43 AM
To: wsbarp <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Tenancy-in-common agreement to run with the land?

PC came into my office on the recommendation of a title officer during the course of a rather unorthodox property purchase. PC and neighbor are jointly purchasing a rectangular lot lying directly between their existing properties. PC and neighbor have decided that going through the boundary line adjustment process. The title officer suggested that wouldn't be a problem, that they should come see me, and that I would just need to make sure that if either of the parties sells their ownership in their primary parcel that their interest in the "community lot" would pass with it. My gut reaction was to create a tenancy-in-common agreement, but I would need to make sure that it runs with the land of the neighboring parcels. I don't see any reason why I couldn't draft that language, but I just want to make sure that I don't miss anything. Has anyone experienced a similar situation and/or have a "best practice" solution (other than "tell the PC to go ahead and do the boundary line adjustment; it will be better for them in the long run" because I already know that and they told me "no thanks")?

Best,
David J. Faber
Faber Feinson PLLC
210 Polk Street, Suite 1
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 379-4110

*** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and destroy the copy you received.***
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20160526/c2d3810d/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list