[WSBARP] UD & Sub-T as Necessary Party
Paul Neumiller
pneumiller at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 6 16:23:31 PST 2016
This is a reality check and a fear of the unknown (I have never dealt with
subtenants before.) I represent the LL. LL rents a rural lot with two
residences to T. T then subleases one to the residences to sub-tenant.
Naturally, there is nothing in writing between anybody. The Sub-T has never
paid rent directly to the LL. LL is aware of Sub-T but not the details. T
in default of rent.
Is Sub-T a necessary party in a UD action? Daniels v. Ward, 35 Wn. App. 697
(Div. 1, 1983) states that a subtenant is NOT a necessary party. Anyone
think otherwise? (I could serve Sub-T but prefer not to because of
additional expense and complications from multiple parties.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20160106/d1de103e/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBARP
mailing list