[WSBARP] Long-Term Adverse Possession

[Tom J. Westbrook]

Hi Marcus, 

I figured you must have been out - thanks for taking the time to reply
and for you thoughts. Hope your enjoying your time away..........we
never get enough of that! 

Best Regards,

             Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Fry
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 5:00 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Long-Term Adverse Possession

Tom:
I'm on vacation but I'll give you a quick answer. I deleted the emails
that you sent me.
I would probably treat him as tenants and give them a 20 day notice
terminating tenancy at end of May and if they're not out then do a
eviction.
As to the unknown people I would just address the notice to unknown
occupants.
I think this would be way faster than an ejectment and since they were
permitted treat them.as tenants as opposed to guests.
Sent from my Samsung Mobile




"Tom J. Westbrook" wrote:
Paul, you should find that answer somewhere in here.

Sincerely,

Tom

Thomas J. Westbrook
Attorney at Law

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CFC835.0D3988D0]

Rodgers, Kee & Card
324 West Bay Drive NW, Suite 201
Olympia, Washington  98502

Phone: 360-352-8311
Facsimile: 360-352-8501
Email: tjw at buddbaylaw.com
Skype: thomas.westbrook
www.buddbaylaw.com

The information contained in this email and attachment(s) are for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain private, privileged
and/or confidential information.  If you are not the addressee, you are
strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or
otherwise using this email or its contents in any way. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone at 360-352-8311 or by e-mail to
reception at buddbaylaw.com<mailto:reception at buddbaylaw.com>, and destroy
the original message from your electronic files.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:08 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBARP] Long-Term Adverse Possession

The standard/usual burden of proof falls on the party who is claiming
real property through adverse possession.  It is my vague recollection
that there is a doctrine that says that if the use of the real property
is long-term, the burden falls on the party resisting the adverse
possession to prove that there is no adverse possession.  That is,
long-term adverse possession shifts the burden of proof from the
"claiming" party to the "resisting" party.  I can't find that doctrine
now.  Anyone able to point me in the right direction?