[WSBARP] Form 21 - no express language re payment of REET

Mark Higgins markthiggins at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 09:51:11 PDT 2015


It is my understanding that, because the tax is the seller's obligation, if
the buyer pays the tax it is treated as additional sales price, causing
another tax calculation and increased tax.​

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Lenard <lwlaw at my180.net> wrote:

> I never use form 21 but my experience has been like Howard’s.  The tax is
> imposed on the seller so that is the default but the parties can negotiate
> otherwise and often do.
>
>
>
> Lenard L. Wittlake, PLLC
>
> Attorney & Counselor at Law
>
> 22 E. Poplar Street, Suite 200
>
> P.O. Box 1233
>
> Walla Walla, WA  99362
>
> (509) 529-1529 voice
>
> (509) 850-3515 fax
>
> LWLaw at my180.net
>
> www.lwattorney.com
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] *On Behalf Of *Howard Herman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:12 PM
>
> *To:* 'WSBA Real Property Listserv'
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Form 21 - no express language re payment of REET
>
>
>
> It is often a matter of negotiation when trying to put a deal together. I
> have seen the purchaser pay the tax many times. “Purchaser to pay all
> closing costs.” A real anxious buyer may offer to pay some or all of the
> broker’s commission. Money is fungible.
>
>
>
> Howard Herman
>
> Herman Herman & Jolley
>
> 509 220 5810
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [
> mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>] *On Behalf Of *Eric Nelsen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:37 PM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Form 21 - no express language re payment of REET
>
>
>
> I think I phrased my question rather badly.
>
>
>
> I wonder why the PSA doesn't say, "Seller pays real estate excise tax." I
> know it's required by law anyway, but there are often statements in a
> contract that are redundant with legal requirements....so is there some
> reason in this case to *avoid* saying it in the contract? Or is it just
> as a case of "everybody knows who pays it so we don't mention it in the
> PSA?"
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> Eric C. Nelsen
>
> SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC
>
> 1320 University St
>
> Seattle WA  98101-2837
>
> phone 206-625-0092
>
> fax 206-625-9040
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [
> mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>] *On Behalf Of *Eric Nelsen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2015 2:20 PM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property listserve (wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com)
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Form 21 - no express language re payment of REET
>
>
>
> I've noticed this before, but now I'm motivated to ask about it. NWMLS
> Form 21 -- the standard residential PSA -- does not expressly say that
> Seller shall pay the real estate excise tax. It is in fact Seller's tax
> burden per WAC 458-61A-301(1)(b)
> <http://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=458-61A-301>, and I know
> that's how it gets paid as a matter of course.
>
>
>
> Now a client is wondering why it's not expressly stated. *Is* there a
> reason why it's not stated explicitly in the PSA?
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Eric C. Nelsen
>
> SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC
>
> 1320 University St
>
> Seattle WA  98101-2837
>
> phone 206-625-0092
>
> fax 206-625-9040
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>



-- 
Mark T. Higgins
Mark T. Higgins, P.C.
P.O. Box 57
Darrington, WA 98241
206-491-2420
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150702/89b093de/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list