[WSBARP] Electronic Sigantures (Docusign vs Adobe Echosign)

[Matt Albrecht]

I also use Echosign and have for about 2 years now and it has worked
flawlessly.  The integration with the desktop Adobe program is nice but a
bit unwieldy.  I still find it easier to just finish my part in Adobe and
save it, then my assistant uploads it and places the signature/initial/text
boxes where they are needed and sends it out from the Echosign web site.

I've had it work well even for farmers who initially complained they didn't
even have a computer (but they had email on their phone).  Next thing we
knew it was returned signed and he called in saying he was surprised how
easy that was and it was "pretty slick."  He just did it with his finger on
the phone and the program worked seamlessly from the email he received.

But now Echosign I think is being rolled into the new Adobe Cloud
subscription so it might be an even better deal.  I think $175/yr for full
service Echosign and a subscription to Professional Adobe V. XI (about $600
otherwise).

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Rowley, Rob <rob at rowleylegal.com> wrote:

> What is the consensus on using either of those services for general legal
> agreements (fee agreements, etc) for a small practitioner? As a 'dirt'
> practitioner I'm familiar with Docusign for my real esate broker clients.
> (e.g., problematic for technologically challenged clients). Thinking of
> catching up with my broker clients.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
>
>
> *Robert R. Rowley*, Attorney at Law
>
> 505 W. Riverside Ave, Suite 500
>
> Spokane, WA  99201
>
> Telephone: (509) 252-5074
>
> Mobile: (509) 994-1143
>
> Facsimile: (509) 928-3084
>
> Email: rob at rowleylegal.com
>
> Web Site: www.rowleylegal.com
>
> Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
> in Washington and Idaho.
>
>  NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be
> protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other
> applicable protections.  If you are not the intended recipient or have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly
> delete the message.  Thank you for your assistance.
>
> DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that responses provided by e-mail means
> are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not
> reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry or analysis which would be
> applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion may very
> well reach a different conclusion.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150403/a25276f1/attachment.html>