[WSBAPT] Denied Order Opening Probate because of Non-Redacted SSN
Brent Williams-Ruth
brent at williams-ruthlaw.com
Wed Sep 17 18:22:28 PDT 2025
considering that I have opened 15 probates since July 1st and this is the
only one to be denied.....I believe this is Judge Scott.
I was reminded about a prior post from a long time back about an attorney
who submits a declaration regarding their review of the death certificate.
I may make up a standard declaration and do the same thing to avoid this as
it is just ridiculous.
*Brent Williams-Ruth* (pronouns: he/him)
*Attorney-At-Law*
*Law Offices of Brent Williams-Ruth, **a division of BWR Consulting, PLLC*
*Physical Address: 500 S 336th Street, Suite 214; Federal Way, WA 98003*
*Mailing Address: **PO BOX 3319; Federal Way, WA 98063 *
Office/Scheduling Phone: (253) 285-7751
For All Meetings & Scheduling: info at williams-ruthlaw.com
e-mail <Brent at Williams-RuthLaw.com> / website
<http://www.williams-ruthlaw.com/> / facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/bwrlaw> /
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 5:42 PM Sandra Perkins <sandra at slplaw.net> wrote:
> Back in 2020, I spoke with the Clerk’s office about uploading (and not
> e-filing) the death certificate. They specifically told me NOT to redact
> anything from the death certificate. It is not e-filed, so it is not
> public. It is just for the Court Commissioner to review as part of the Ex
> Parte submission.
>
>
>
> Obviously, Brent is being told something different now. Is this a new
> rule, or just a quirk of Judge Scott’s?
>
>
>
> Sandra Perkins
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *Carl Gay
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 17, 2025 5:04 PM
> *To:* WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBAPT] Denied Order Opening Probate because of
> Non-Redacted SSN
>
>
>
> For a very long time, I have always redacted the decedent’s Social
> Security number and mother’s maiden name.
>
> Why invite identity theft?
>
>
>
> CARL LLOYD GAY
>
>
>
> Non nobis solum nati sumus
>
> “Not unto ourselves alone are we born”
>
> ~the motto of Willamette University~
>
>
>
> *Law Offices*
>
> GREENAWAY & GAY
>
> *Attorneys and Counselors at Law *
>
> (*Established 1985)*
>
>
>
> 734 East First Street Suite A
>
> Port Angeles, Washington 98362
>
> Email carl at greenawaylawfirm.com
>
> Telephone (360) 452-3323
>
> Facsimile (360) 452-3724
>
>
>
> THIS EMAIL TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE
> INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED, AND MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED
> AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT IS COVERED BY THE ELECTRONIC
> COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT (18 USC §§ 2510-2521). IF YOU ARE NOT THE
> INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER THE MESSAGE TO THE
> INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
> DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
> YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR; PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY
> BY TELEPHONE AND/OR EMAIL AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *Brent Williams-Ruth
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 17, 2025 4:44 PM
> *To:* WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* [WSBAPT] Denied Order Opening Probate because of Non-Redacted
> SSN
>
>
>
> I just had Judge Scott in King County deny an order opening probate
> because I didn't comply with GR 31 and because I did not redact the SSN
> from the death certificate.
>
>
>
> First off - question - does anyone redact the SSN before presenting to
> open for probate? In the 10 years I have been doing this now, I have never
> redacted the SSN. Before COVID, I opened cases in person and would just
> hand up a death certificate. Then came covid and I would upload BUT NOT
> FILE; then came the new KC Script portal and they have the "additional
> document" tab where again, I would upload but not file.
>
>
>
> GR 31(e)(1) states that you have to redact any personally identifiable
> information from documents being FILED with the Court.
>
>
>
> Just curious what others do and if you have encountered this before.
>
>
>
> Brent
>
>
> *Brent Williams-Ruth* (pronouns: he/him)
> *Attorney-At-Law*
>
> *Law Offices of Brent Williams-Ruth, **a division of BWR Consulting, PLLC*
>
> *Physical Address: 500 S 336th Street, Suite 214; Federal Way, WA 98003*
>
> *Mailing Address:** PO BOX 3319; Federal Way, WA 98063 *
>
> Office/Scheduling Phone: (253) 285-7751
>
> For All Meetings & Scheduling: info at williams-ruthlaw.com
>
> e-mail <Brent at Williams-RuthLaw.com> / website
> <http://www.williams-ruthlaw.com/> / facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/bwrlaw> /
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20250917/79b34bbe/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBAPT
mailing list