[WSBAPT] Will vs. TODD

[Lewis, Amy C.]

It might be simpler to combine a TODD with a nonprobate notice to creditors procedure and skip the disclaimer.

A non-spouse beneficiary cannot make a "qualified" disclaimer of one interest and still receive the asset in a different capacity - only a spouse can do that under federal law.  Might be possible to make a non-qualified disclaimer in your scenario, but you would need to take a look at RCW 11.86.041(2) and draft carefully.


Amy Lewis, Attorney
Pronouns she/her/hers
[cid:Logo_fa335a1d-9f24-4802-a3dd-b58f259e3c98.png]

909 A Street, Suite 600 | Tacoma, WA 98402
phone 253.572.4500 | fax 253.272.5732 | www.eisenhowerlaw.com<http://www.eisenhowerlaw.com/>
From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 3:33 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBAPT] Will vs. TODD

OK, so we know the title companies have multiple problems with Transfer on Death Deeds.  But, I was wondering has anyone done an analysis of whether it is a good idea to prepare a TODD anyway and give the family an option to use the TODD if the circumstances are right when the Decedent passes. (A lot of estate planning clients are coming in and requesting a TODD)  RCW 64.80.100 appears to lock-in the family if the Decedent signed and recorded a TODD.  But a beneficiary can still disclaim the interest using RCWs 64.80.110 and 11.86.041 "(1) Unless the instrument creating an interest directs to the contrary, the interest disclaimed shall pass as if the beneficiary had died immediately prior to the date of the transfer of the interest."

So, can a beneficiary disclaim receiving the real property via the TODD but still receive the real property via terms of the Decedent's Will?  (Yeah, I know, the recipients under the TODD and under the Will need to be the same.)  If so, then by preparing the TODD, the family may have the option to utilize the TODD if it's a good idea and disclaim the TODD if its not a good idea.  Any thoughts?


[cid:image001.jpg at 01DAF326.93CACFE0]



 IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail message (and any attachments accompanying it) may contain confidential information, including information protected by attorney-client privilege. The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Delivery of this message to anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended to waive any privilege or otherwise detract from the confidentiality of the message. If you are not the intended recipient, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission. Rather, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of the message and its attachments, if any.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20240821/603c6911/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14264 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20240821/603c6911/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Logo_fa335a1d-9f24-4802-a3dd-b58f259e3c98.png
Type: image/png
Size: 22687 bytes
Desc: Logo_fa335a1d-9f24-4802-a3dd-b58f259e3c98.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20240821/603c6911/Logo_fa335a1d-9f24-4802-a3dd-b58f259e3c98.png>