[WSBAPT] WSBAPT Re: What is fair billing

Roger Hawkes roger at skyvalleylawyers.com
Tue Aug 15 10:25:10 PDT 2023


I, too disagree with the notion that mentioning rates is a violation of any antitrust statute.  I would love to see the case or reasoning that says so.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Carmen Rowe
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 4:20 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] WSBAPT Re: What is fair billing

Again responding off digest so am not including the original question - but long & short was question on how to bill when doing non-attorney work

I believe (?) there is a WSBA ethics opinion on this, and/or caselaw, and/or a RPC footnote - but confident there is something formal out there saying you can only bill commensurate with the level of work, under the "reasonable fees" rule. So if you do paralegal work, you bill paralegal rate. Of course, there can be a lot of overlap in such work so it will come down to attorney discretion (and how they feel about what they are billing the client). But I'd ised a stepped system - both to comply with ethics and because that is what is fair to the client. I instituted that for myself, though even at the firms with staff I have worked at, if I (or anyone) did "lower level" work, that's how it was billed.

I think the ethical restrictions go so far as to say purely administrative tasks should be considered part of doing business, and thus worked into the attorney's hourly rate, not billed separately. I forget as it's been a while since I've seen that discussion, but I believe there is something out there on this.

(And as a side-note, discussing hourly rate - perhaps even a detailed discussion on what tasks are billed other than as regulated by RPCs - is considered a violation of the Sherman Act. I really super disagree with that in this type of discussion context given the tremendous range of attorney firms/experience/field of practice and how that all impacts rates ... but there is some formal opinion out there somewhere that says so, so I'd refrain from being specific as to dollars)


Carmen Rowe

[https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yaIwO8NwDh1yJGQWP1qK1vhwcBcK5yYclhzfMrEc3GuEfI5eiJ-wA30feUaQTq_2U2bQPszU4]

Phone: (360) 669-3576 (direct cell)
Email:  Carmen at GryphonLawGroup.com<mailto:Carmen at GryphonLawGroup.com>

Olympia/Lacey and primary mailing office:
1415 College Street SE, Lacey, WA 98503

Seattle office: We are currently moving our Seattle location - notice of new address coming soon!

NOTICE REGARDING OPERATIONS AND COVID-19: We see our community as working together to address COVID and its impact on our lives, health, and business. The nature of our practice lends itself well to virtual operation and we offer a range of flexible solutions to best work with your needs and preferences. We are here to support you.

Privileged and confidential: This message is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please let us know, and please delete and disregard any information it contains. We thank you for your respect in not sharing this email with anyone.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20230815/339d1b9b/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list