[WSBAPT] Notary Electronic signature rejected on Oath by Court

Sun Apr 26 10:04:25 PDT 2020

This is troublesome! Did the Judge say why it looked suspicious? I am
hoping to begin offering e-notary soon (waiting on the DOL's response to my
license update) and I want to make sure we avoid any pitfalls.  Thank you
for sharing this!

*Kira M. Rubel*

**Licensed in CA and WA*

*The Harbor Law Group (**formerly, Law Office of Kira M. Rubel**)*

*3615 Harborview Drive NW, Suite C (on the dock)*

*Gig Harbor, WA 98332-2129*

Tel.  (253) 251-2955 | (800) 836-6531

Fax. (206) 238-1694

Zoom ID. (253) 251-2977

www.theharborlawgroup.com

The information transmitted (including any attachments) is intended only
for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material that may be protected by law from disclosure.  If you
receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your computer.  Any
review, retransmission, dissemination, copying, or other use of, or taking
of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

No Tax Advice: No matter what I say in this email, I am an attorney, not a
tax advisor and cannot provide any tax advice to you! Please refer all tax
matters to your own tax advisor to ensure you are receiving the most
up-to-date and relevant tax advice.

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:32 AM Dalynne Singleton <dalynne at glgmail.com>
wrote:

> Caution:  I wanted to let the listserve know that even though I followed
> the new rules for electronic service notary, it was rejected by the Court
> today on an Oath by Administrator.  Administrator paid for the Notary
> services.
>
>
>
> The King County Superior Court clerk rejected the Oath of Administrator
> with the electronic signatures even though the Notary was one recognized,
> licensed properly and recommended.
>
> Clerk said:  He thought the notary looked suspicious so his manager
> looked at it and the court won’t accept it to be filed.  He said to send
> an oath without notary but with a perjury clause and he would accept an
> original Oath presented in that way.
>
> I am letting the electronic signature Notary know as well.
>
>
>
> *Dalynne Singleton*
>
> *Gourley Law Group*
>
> *Snohomish Escrow*
>
> *The Exchange Connection*
>
> 1002 10th Street / PO Box 1091
>
> Snohomish, WA 98291
>
> 360.568.5065
>
> 360.568.8092  fax
>
> *dalynne at glgmail.com <dalynne at glgmail.com>*
>
> *Website:  www.glglawgroup.com <http://www.glglawgroup.com>*
>
>
>
> *Due to COVID-19, I am working remotely.  As a result, I cannot accept any
> physical messenger service at this time.  Please email all pleadings and
> agreed upon service documents to theresa at glgmail.com <theresa at glgmail.com>.*
>
> *In-person meetings are not possible at this time.  Email is the best way
> to reach me until further notice.  If you would like a telephone
> conference, please email my paralegal theresa at glgmail.com
> <theresa at glgmail.com> or dara at glgmail.com <dara at glgmail.com> to set such
> conference.*
>
>
>
> *Thank you very much and stay safe!*
>
>
>
> *LICENSED** IN WASHINGTON AND OREGON*
>
> IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail message (and any attachments
> accompanying it) may contain confidential information, including
> information protected by attorney-client privilege. The information is
> intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  Delivery of this
> message to anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended to
> waive any privilege or otherwise detract from the confidentiality of the
> message.  If you are not the intended recipient, or if this message has
> been addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce,
> distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission, rather, please
> promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of
> the message and its attachments, if any.
>
>   [image: Rated by Super Lawyers]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.superlawyers.com_redir-3Fr-3Dhttp-3A__www.superlawyers.com_washington_lawyer_Gary-2DManca_ca059d21-2D1b6e-2D4fca-2Db396-2D80c253f82402.html-26c-3Demail-5FSmall-5Fbadge-26i-3Dca059d21-2D1b6e-2D4fca-2Db396-2D80c253f82402&d=DwMGaQ&c=4VfW4Y7UDKzr0jHM1Tk29w&r=wJy-5dBh2e8cdp8KTDyWsjq7WPfG_HRNpImWO5yfs2A&m=FCmO2jSMMhwxfYb-8WN5A3L-M6GKeJ_8gc6cS3vECHM&s=z2j9M4GPJAL7pempIOe0TGAPkMWrzXJSlY1lyMRDlRg&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20200426/f5a3ba98/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20200426/f5a3ba98/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1524 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20200426/f5a3ba98/image002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 4868 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20200426/f5a3ba98/image003.gif>