[WSBAPT] wrongfully excluded heir

[Philip N. Jones]

It is not a gross oversimplification.  Sounds good to me.  Keep it simple.
Phil Jones

Philip N. Jones
Duffy Kekel LLP
Portland, OR
pjones at duffykekel.com<mailto:pjones at duffykekel.com>
(503) 226-1371

On Jan 10, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Tom Westbrook <tjw at w3net.net<mailto:tjw at w3net.net>> wrote:

This is probably a gross oversimplification and someone with a lot more legal talent than me would have some reason why it won’t work, but what if the beneficiaries took their inheritance and later each gifted a portion to the sibling left out as part of their estate plan. Seems like the gift would transfer with it the steeped up tax basis of each beneficiary upon death of parent, but of course each would get a hit on their lifetime gift exemption.

Sincerely,

Tom

Thomas J. Westbrook
Attorney at Law

<image001.jpg>

Rodgers, Kee & Card, P.S.
324 West Bay Drive NW, Suite 201
Olympia, Washington  98502

Phone: 360-352-8311
Facsimile: 360-352-8501
Email: tjw at buddbaylaw.com<mailto:tjw at buddbaylaw.com>
Skype: thomas.westbrook
www.buddbaylaw.com<http://www.buddbaylaw.com/>

The information contained in this email and attachment(s) are for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain private, privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are not the addressee, you are strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this email or its contents in any way. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 360-352-8311 or by e-mail to shannon at buddbaylaw.com<mailto:shannon at buddbaylaw.com>, and destroy the original message from your electronic files.




From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Felicia Value
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:39 AM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] wrongfully excluded heir




Dang y'all.  Phil just dropped the mic.
On 1/10/2019 11:04 AM, Philip N. Jones wrote:
An assignment would be a taxable gift, but (as has been noted) a gift is not really taxable unless the donor has enough assets to be subject to the federal estate tax.  But watch out for a spendthrift/nonassignment clause.  Which leads us to TEDRA.
A transfer pursuant to a TEDRA would also be a gift unless is it backed up by a bona fide enforceable cause of action.  If a bona fide dispute exists between the beneficiaries, and the agreement is intended to resolve that dispute, then the resulting transfer will not constitute a gift, but instead will constitute a settlement in satisfaction of the dispute.  In such a situation, the agreement should recite the nature of the dispute and the fact that the altered division of the property is intended to resolve that dispute.  For somewhat greater certainty that the result will be honored by the IRS, the aggrieved beneficiary should first file a will contest, a petition for instructions, an objection to the final account, or some other appropriate pleading to lend greater credence to the notion that a bona fide dispute exists.  However, neither the IRS nor the courts will respect a settlement based on “friendly” litigation where no bona fide dispute is present.  For example, in Grossman v. Campbell, 368 F.2d 206, 18 AFTR2d 6251 (5th Cir. 1966), the court held that a settlement agreement had been reached in a situation where no real dispute existed, and thus the settlement would be ignored for estate tax purposes.  The Ninth Circuit reached a similar result in Commissioner v. Vease, 314 F.2d 79, 11 AFTR2d 1800 (9th Cir. 1963), rev’g. 35 T.C. 1184 (1961).  In that case, the court concluded that a settlement agreement had not resulted from a bona fide will contest, but instead had resulted from “nothing more than a voluntary rearrangement of property interests acquired under an admittedly valid will.”  See also Wolfsen v. Smyth, 223 F.2d 111 (9th Cir. 1955); Bath v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1975-102.  Other examples of settlements or trust modifications that were disregarded for tax purposes include Aronson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2003-189; Brandon v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 327 (1986), rev’d on other grounds, 828 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1987), on remand 91 T.C. 829 (1988); Simpson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1994-259; Crown Income Charitable Fund v. Commissioner, 8 F.3d 571 (7th Cir. 1993); La Meres v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 294 (1992); CCA 201651013; see also Rev. Rul. 89-31, 1989-1 C.B. 277.

Phil Jones
Portland, OR

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Sm
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:44 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com><mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] wrongfully excluded heir

Could you do a partial assignment of interest? Or is that treated as a gift?

Cheers,

Christopher Small
CMS Law Firm LLC<http://cmslawfirm.com>
150 Lake St. S., Suite 218
Kirkland, WA 98033
206.659.1512


Legal stuff I have to put in... To ensure compliance with Treasury Department and IRS regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly indicated otherwise, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written by CMS Law Firm LLC to be used, and cannot be used by the taxpayer, for the purpose of: (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under the Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein (or any attachments).


On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:42 AM Eric Nelsen <Eric at sayrelawoffices.com<mailto:Eric at sayrelawoffices.com>> wrote:
Lots of tax implications if it's done by any method other than inheritance. I have done the heirs-gift-to-excluded-child method but only where the individual gifts were below the federal annual gift exclusion limit (currently $15,000, but lower back when I did this in a case).

I think best bet on your facts, assuming there isn't a fact problem I don't know about, is a TEDRA Agreement executed by all heirs, indicating that the Will should be reformed because its provision concerning the excluded sibling is in dispute, that everyone agrees that the true intent of the testator was to provide equal benefit to all children, that the testator made a mistake of fact in excluding the sibling (not realizing that the expected benefit was not received or was not certain to be received), and that but for that mistake, the testator would have included all children as equal heirs. And therefore, the heirs all agree that the Estate should be split in equal shares. That way everyone gets the distribution as inheritance and the tax implications go away.

Sincerely,

Eric

Eric C. Nelsen
SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC
1417 31st Ave South
Seattle WA  98144-3909
phone 206-625-0092
fax 206-625-9040

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>] On Behalf Of Allen Draher
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:14 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: [WSBAPT] wrongfully excluded heir

I’m meeting with a potential client.  She is the named PR in parent’s will.  Estate passes to all but one sibling.  This sibling was excluded because of some benefit to be received that wasn’t and all other siblings want to divide estate among all siblings.  Each share will be several hundred thousand dollars, but estate will be under WA State Estate Tax limit.  I suppose each sibling could gift to the excluded sibling and file Federal Gift Tax Returns.  With the current federal exclusion amounts not likely to be an issue using some of the existing credit, but who knows what the future will bring.  Has anyone a more creative solution they’ve used?  Have excluded sibling file a creditor’s claim that is approved by the PR with non-intervention powers?  (I would have other siblings consent in writing).  TEDRA?  Thank you.

Allen Draher

Law Office of Allen Draher, PLLC
5426 California Ave. S.W.
Seattle, WA 98136

ph   206-935-2998
allen at draherlaw.com<mailto:allen at draherlaw.com>

__________________________________________________________

NOTICE:  This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this communication and/or shred the materials and any attachments and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.
__________________________________________________________

To comply with IRS regulations, we are required to inform you that this message, if it contains advice relating to federal taxes, cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law.

_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt



_______________________________________________

WSBAPT mailing list

WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>

http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt

--

Felicia Value

Attorney at Law

PO Box 578/116 N. Third

La Conner,  WA 98257

(360) 466-2088

Felicia at skagitprobate.com<mailto:Felicia at skagitprobate.com>

_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20190111/10226684/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15390 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20190111/10226684/image001.jpg>