[WSBAPT] Guardianship for California Minor to Collect Inherited IRAs

[Marsha Hudson]

How do you / can you do that without opening a separate cause number - California case? - so that the probate can be closed? 

Plese excus the brevite and any tipoes.  This emale was sent from Marsha's stoopid iPhone.

Marsha C. Hudson
Attorney at Law #23330
3221 NW 62nd St
Seattle, WA 98107
Telephone: 206-297-3933
Fax: 206-357-9356
marsha at griffyn.us

Life's most persistent and urgent question is: What are you doing for others? - Martin Luther King, Jr.

This e-mail may contain information that is protected by attorney-client, work product and/or other privileges.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, use, or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact me immediately and return the email by forwarding it to this office at marsha at griffyn.us and then deleting the e-mail.
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 

> On Nov 28, 2018, at 9:49 AM, Marcus Fry <mfry at lyon-law.com> wrote:
> 
> You can get a court order that blocks UTMA withdrawals without court approval with the caveat in the order that allows the custodian to make investment decisions, such as buying and selling, with the funds in the account.  Great way to protect the account while also avoiding the expense of a third party.   
>  
> Marcus J. Fry
> Lyon, Weigand & Gustafson, P.S. 
> P.O. Box 1689 
> Yakima, Washington  98907 
> Telephone:  (509) 248-7220 
> Facsimile:  (509) 575-1883
>  
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Candace Wilkerson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 9:40 AM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Guardianship for California Minor to Collect Inherited IRAs
>  
> Oh, I see.  You’re right, not a good idea if there is concern about Mom.  The custodial accounts don’t generally offer much protection.
>  
> Candace
>  
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Elizabeth Bateman
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 3:39 PM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Guardianship for California Minor to Collect Inherited IRAs
>  
> Thanks, Candace.  The estate isn't the beneficiary (the kid was specifically designated), so I don't think I have any authority to claim the accounts.  There's also some concern that we don't want mom to have access to the funds... Elizabeth 
>  
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:40 PM Candace Wilkerson <cwilkerson at wongfleming.com> wrote:
> Elizabeth,
>  
> Couldn’t you, as PR, obtain the funds from the two accounts and then transfer them to the child via UGMA/UTMA with the child’s parent as custodian of the accounts?  CA has a variation of UTMA (called “CUTMA”) that should work.
>  
> Let me know if I can help.  Although I’ve never done this in CA, I am licensed in CA.
>  
> Candace Wilkerson
>  
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Elizabeth Bateman
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 1:09 PM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Guardianship for California Minor to Collect Inherited IRAs
>  
> Sorry if this is duplicative--tried to send this out yesterday, but I don't think it went through.  Either that, or had no takers, lol.  
>  
> I am the PR of a King County intestate estate where the intestate heir is a minor and a resident of California.  A guardian will be necessary to claim two small IRA accounts (less than $40k), of which the minor is the named beneficiary.  I am of the opinion that the King County Superior Court does not have jurisdiction over the California child sufficient to appoint a guardian for him here.  Can someone prove me wrong?  Does the child's parent have any authority to consent to the King County court's jurisdiction over her teenage child?  If so, what is that authority?  
>  
> And practically, is it even feasible for the Court to appoint a person or entity in WA as guardian for an individual in another state?    
>  
> In the alternative, can someone recommend a guardianship attorney in or near Alameda County, CA?
>  
> Thanks in advance for your input.  
>  
> Elizabeth
>  
> --
> Elizabeth G. Bateman
> 
> Associate Attorney
> 
> Admitted in Washington and Minnesota
> 
> Bateman Law Group, PLLC
> 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2525
> 
> Seattle, WA  98104-4089
> 
> Tel: (206) 224-0900
> 
> Fax: (206) 467-8028
> 
>  
> 
> This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This information is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender via email or by telephone at (206) 224-0900.
> 
> 
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE - Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> 
>  
> --
> Elizabeth G. Bateman
> 
> Associate Attorney
> 
> Admitted in Washington and Minnesota
> 
> Bateman Law Group, PLLC
> 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2525
> 
> Seattle, WA  98104-4089
> 
> Tel: (206) 224-0900
> 
> Fax: (206) 467-8028
> 
>  
> 
> This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This information is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender via email or by telephone at (206) 224-0900.
> 
> 
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE - Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20181128/c97ce1ea/attachment.html>