[WSBAPT] Another Out of Country PR issue
pugetsoundlaw at gmail.com
pugetsoundlaw at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 12:03:50 PDT 2016
I appreciate the creativity and the advisable step of getting the
endorsement of the court to use a declaration in the order of appointment to
accommodate a remotely located client. But can a court order waive a
statutorily prescribed condition precedent to the issuance of letters?
There's not any permissive language in RCW 11.28.170 allowing for the
court's discretion to waive the requirement, like in setting the amount of
the bond or substitute security. I think this is analogous to someone with
a felony conviction (not vacated) being disqualified, there isn't a work
around.
As inconvenient as it might be, I think the statue is pretty clear. The
statute doesn't just say that the person appointed shall take and subscribe
an oath that the duties will be performed according to law. If that is all
that it said, then a substitute declaration might be allowed - and assuming
the exclusions in RCW 9A.72.085(4) don't apply.
But I think that this approach ignores the part of RCW 11.28.170 that says
the oath "must" be taken and subscribed "before some person authorized to
administer oaths." A declaration under penalty of perjury is not made
before another person, it is signed by the declarer alone. So, I think that
you still run afoul of the plain language of the statute that requires there
to be another person involved, and that other person must have a specific
type of authority, i.e. to administer oaths.
Tara M. Roberts
Puget Sound Law pllc
roberts at pugetsoundlaw.com <mailto:roberts at pugetsoundlaw.com>
******************************
The information contained in this email is intended as a collegial exchange
of ideas, may be incorrect, and is made without warranty of accuracy of any
kind. The ideas and opinions expressed in this message are offered as
unresearched thoughts, may be retracted or changed without notice, and do
not create any attorney-client relationship. They should not be relied upon
as applicable to any particular fact situation. Thank you.
******************************
From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Marcia Mellinger
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 4:06 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Another Out of Country PR issue
We have used Declarations of PRs for people who are in remote locations.
You need to revise your order to state that Letters Testamentary will be
issued upon the filing of a Declaration. We have had no trouble with this
in King County. Best, Marcia
_____
From: <mailto:jgrant at accima.com> jgrant at accima.com
To: <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com> wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:05:27 -0700
CC: <mailto:secretary.jgrant at accima.com> secretary.jgrant at accima.com
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Another Out of Country PR issue
Interesting. I have regularly filed PR oath's signed in declaration form
and had no problem with the judge signing the Order appointing PR, but I
believe you are correct after reading those statutes. Maybe this is another
statutory change that should be made to make probates more user friendly.
If my litigation witness can sign a declaration, for example, in support of
a motion for summary judgment, and lets assume the litigation involves a
million dollar claim, then why can't my prospective PR, who is appointed to
act as such by the testator , sign a binding promise under penalty of
perjury etc. to follow the law as a PR without appearing before a Notary?
After all we don't make a prospective PR promise to support and defend the
constitution of the US and of the State of Washington anymore.
Note to Probate Secretary, Oaths need to be signed in front of a Notary.
Joshua F. Grant, PS
Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 619
Wilbur, WA 99185
tel 509 647 5578
fax 509 647 2734
From: <mailto:pugetsoundlaw at gmail.com> pugetsoundlaw at gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 2:31 PM
To: <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com> 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv'
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Another Out of Country PR issue
I don't think you can get away with a witness for an oath. The oath isn't
equivalent to "a declaration in lieu of affidavit" situation. RCW 11.28.170
requires the PR to take and subscribe an oath, before some person authorized
to administer oaths. The notary is a public official that is authorized to
administer oaths and is usually the most convenient.
In Washington, RCW 5.28.010 gives a list of those who may administer oaths:
Every court, judge, clerk of a court, state-certified court reporter, or
notary public, is authorized to take testimony in any action, suit or
proceeding, and such other persons in particular cases as authorized by law.
For foreign PRs, usually a consulate is the best bet. Maybe there are
others officials near her that can administer an oath in lieu of a notary?
Tara M. Roberts
Puget Sound Law pllc
<mailto:roberts at pugetsoundlaw.com> roberts at pugetsoundlaw.com
******************************
The information contained in this email is intended as a collegial exchange
of ideas, may be incorrect, and is made without warranty of accuracy of any
kind. The ideas and opinions expressed in this message are offered as
unresearched thoughts, may be retracted or changed without notice, and do
not create any attorney-client relationship. They should not be relied upon
as applicable to any particular fact situation. Thank you.
******************************
From: <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [
<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Russell Mikow
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 2:03 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv < <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBAPT] Another Out of Country PR issue
Dear all:
I am preparing to file a probate on behalf of a potential PR who lives in a
rural part of Mexico. We normally have the PR sign and have notarized the
Oath of Personal Representative, but she is having difficulty finding a
notary in her locale. Would the Oath be sufficient for RCW 11.28.1701
purposes if it is signed and witnessed (not notarized)? Any bright ideas how
to address this issue? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Very truly yours,
ADVANCE LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC
Russell L. Mikow
8113 W. Quinault Ave., Ste. 101
Kennewick, WA 99336
(509) 851-7884
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS ABOVE!
<mailto:russell at alsnorthwest.com> russell at alsnorthwest.com
<http://www.alsnorthwest.com/> www.alsnorthwest.com
Executive Committee Secretary, Washington Chapter, American Immigration
Lawyers Association 2015-2016
This E-Mail message and any documentation accompanying this transmission may
contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended solely
for the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended
addressee/recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or reliance on the contents of this E-Mail
information is strictly prohibited and may result in legal action against
you. Please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission and
immediately delete/destroy the message and any accompanying documents.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of this firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it. Although this message and any attachments are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any
computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free, and no
responsibility is accepted by this firm for any loss or damage in any way
from its use. Thank you.
_____
_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
<mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
_______________________________________________ WSBAPT mailing list
<mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160624/b5f5e02b/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBAPT
mailing list