[WSBAPT] Probate: Removing family member from deceased's home - Unlawful Detainer or Ejectment?

Rob Wilson-Hoss rob at hctc.com
Wed Jan 27 15:26:49 PST 2016


I have attached a brief that worked and that I have provided to others on this list serve the past couple of years. Some of the same issues. 

 

Rob

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss 
Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP 
236 West Birch Street 
Shelton, WA 98584 
360 426-2999

www.hossandwilson-hoss.com
rob at hctc.com

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above) and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.  Thank you.

 

This office does debt collection and this e-mail may be an attempt to collect a debt, Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.  To the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692) applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of James L. Sorenson
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:00 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Cc: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Probate: Removing family member from deceased's home - Unlawful Detainer or Ejectment?

 

I had a similar problem with a brother who would not leave. The PR tried an unlawful detainer action and the commissioner said that unless a lease was offered  or the brother was willing to pay rent that an unlawful detainer would not work.  The PR used an ejectment action with B. Jacob Bozeman (425 248-2164) and was successful.  He could solve this problem for you.  He has been successful for many of my clients.

 

James L. Sorenson

Attorney at Law

929 N. 130th Suite14

Seattle, Washington  98133

206 365-0346


On Jan 27, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Lenard <lwlaw at my180.net> wrote:

How did daughter gain possession?  If it was by permission of the owner then she is not under paragraph 6.  See Turner v. White, 20 Wn.App. 290, 291-92, 579 P.2d 410 (Div. 3 1978) 

According to Division 3 an unlawful detainer is not available against a tenant-at-will.  

If she is a tenant-at-will, that leaves ejectment and TEDRA.  Under 11.48.020 the PR has a right to possession of all estate property, but this statute is not tied into the UD framework.  Why not ask the court to use its plenary power under TEDRA to order a writ of restitution?

 

Lenard L. Wittlake 

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Gates
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:56 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Probate: Removing family member from deceased's home - Unlawful Detainer or Ejectment?

 

See RCW 59.12.030(6).  Only a three day Notice is required before starting Unlawful Detainer action.

 

Tom

 

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:40 AM, David Faber <david at faberfeinson.com> wrote:

Good morning:

 

Client is PR. Deceased's daughter is currently living in home of deceased and needs to be removed. My first thought is a 20-day notice to terminate followed by unlawful detainer if she fails, but I recall a dispute about whether an unlawful detainer is appropriate for this sort of situation. Would an ejectment action be more proper? The house is being sold and the purchaser doesn't wants the daughter out as part of the transfer.




Best,

David J. Faber

Faber Feinson PLLC

210 Polk Street, Suite 1

Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 379-4110

 

*** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and destroy the copy you received.***


_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160127/e53bcaa1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: quiet title vs unlawful detainer.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 37729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160127/e53bcaa1/quiettitlevsunlawfuldetainer.docx>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list