[WSBAPT] probate petition where assets unclear

Marcia Mellinger macmell at hotmail.com
Mon Oct 12 15:23:40 PDT 2015


My petitions state that the assets exceed the indebtedness.  A rough ballpark of the assets (for example, they exceed $100k) has been enough to satisfy the solvency question.

> From: dalynne at singletonlawgroup.net
> To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:06:05 +0000
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] probate petition where assets unclear
> 
> If there is real property, you should be able to get information from auditor's office on value of real property.  Then, you could attach the real property statement showing value of property.
> 
> 
> Dalynne Singleton
> 
> 3215 NW Lowell Street, #161
> Silverdale, WA  98383
> Phone: 360-329-4079
> Fax:     360-443-1259
> E-mail: dalynne at singletonlawgroup.net
> Web:    www.singletonlawgroup.net
> 
> LICENSED IN WASHINGTON AND OREGON
> IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail message (and any attachments accompanying it) may contain confidential information, including information protected by attorney-client privilege. The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  Delivery of this message to anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended to waive any privilege or otherwise detract from the confidentiality of the message.  If you are not the intended recipient, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission, rather, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of the message and its attachments, if any.
> 
>           
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Melinda Grout
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 3:02 PM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBAPT] probate petition where assets unclear
> 
> Happy Monday.
> 
> Petition to open probate would normally recite:  Estate includes:   Real property $ X, Personal Property $ X.   
> 
> However PR does not yet know enough to provide even an estimate of value of estate (although PR is quite certain estate is solvent).   Therefore, a statement in the Petition, declared under penalty of perjury, that "Petitioner does not currently know the value of the probate estate, but believes, subject to further information, that assets including both real and personal property exceed liabilities" did not fly with the commissioner.  
> 
> How would one handle this instead?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20151012/b0752fef/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list