[WSBAPT] trust amendment

[Paul H. Grant]

I don't disagree with you Sam, looking only at the statute it requires the trust to be followed and if the trust is silent as to revocation or amendment then it is treated as a codicil.  As with every case, who is complaining and who will challenge if the trustee adheres to the changes.  Maybe all the beneficiaries want the changes.  

I was (simplistically) only pointing the question to what I thought was the applicable statute with an uninformed opinion to boot.

Sent from my iPhone ~ Paul H. Grant

> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Sam Furgason <sam at furgasons.com> wrote:
> 
> Paul,
>  
> I wouldn’t be too sure about the unenforceability. Living trusts have been looked at as will substitutes, so some of the doctrines of will interpretation might apply. I think the trustor, who was also the trustee at the time, has complied with the trust’s requirement of delivery to the trustee since s/he is the trustee, and with the requirement for writing by amending the trust on its face. S/he should not be required to agree with herself/himself by written acceptance; a court could be guided by the oft-repeated maxim, now set out in RCW 11.12.230, that the decedent’s intent should be honored. The modification of the trust could be considered “substantial compliance with a method provided in the terms of the trust” (RCW 11.103.030(3)(a). Analogously, Washington courts have held that minor strike-outs on wills do not amount to revocation of the will, and should be considered partial revocations only, with the rest of the instrument being enforceable. I think I’d want some court guidance on this, or at least written agreement by all affected parties, before carrying out distributions.
>  
> My thoughts.
>  
> Samuel L. Furgason
> Samuel L. Furgason, Inc, PS
> (Not accepting new business)
> 10655 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 701
> Bellevue, Washington 98004
> MAIL TO:
> PO Box 102
> Medina, WA 98039-0102
> Work:    (425) 649-1122
> Cell:       (425) 445-9909
> Email: sam at furgasons.com
>  
>  
>  
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Paul Grant
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 10:43 AM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] trust amendment
>  
> see rcw 11.103.030 -  in essence the trust rules the day.  Notes on the trust are not amendments unless the trust specifies they are accepted.  With the information provided I would say the notes are unenforceable. 
> 
> 
> Paul H. Grant - JD, LL.M
> 
> Planning with Purpose, Inc
> Lynnwood, WA 98036
> 425-939-9948
> www.planningwithpurposeinc.com
> 
> Estate Planning. Business Planning. Wealth Succession.
>  
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Marilyn J Kliman <marilyn at marilynjklimanlaw.com> wrote:
> Listmates –
>  
> Client is Trustee of decedent’s RLT.
>  
> Trust document states that settlor “…may at any time …amend any of the terms of this trust by a written document delivered to the trustee.” Decedent (as settlor/trustee) made multiple handwritten edits on the trust document over the years. There are no dates, signatures or notarization, none of which, obviously, are required by terms of the trust.
>  
> My question is, are these unenforceable amendments, or valid if proven to be in decedent’s handwriting?
>  
> (Apologies to folks on both listserves)
>  
> Thank you,
> Marilyn
>  
>  
> Marilyn J. Kliman, Attorney at Law
> Marilyn J. Kliman Law, PLLC
> 510 Bell Street
> Edmonds, WA 98020
> 206.499.0993
> Marilyn at MarilynJKlimanLaw.com
> www.MarilynJKlimanLaw.com
>  
> “Those who lack humor are without judgment and should be trusted with nothing.”   Clive James
>  
> NOTICE: Information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally protected from disclosure. Our understanding is that intended recipients consent to use of e-mail unless we are notified otherwise in writing. If you are neither the intended recipient nor an employee or agent of the intended recipient, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> www.avast.com
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
>  
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150730/6cb3756e/attachment.html>