[WSBAPT] Small Estate Affidavit (RCW 11.62.010)

Josh Grant jgrant at accima.com
Fri Jan 16 13:49:12 PST 2015


I agree with Sara.

There are two forms. One is the claim form.  The second form is, when one is claiming the total, and all of the beneficiaries have to sign that authorization form before one can claim the total.

From: Sara D. Longley 
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 6:24 PM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' 
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Small Estate Affidavit (RCW 11.62.010)

Having prepared one (1) small estate affidavit and having carefully read the statute at that time, I believe the confusion lies in knowing what, exactly, your client is claiming.

 

If, on the one hand, your client is claiming only that portion of the account to which he has a personal right of ownership, he must simply give notice to the other potential claimants before doing so.  

 

If, on the other hand, he wishes to claim any portion of the account that rightfully belongs to a different claiming successor, he must have the written authority of that other successor in order to take possession of that successor’s portion.  

 

The result is that any claiming successor who doesn’t give written authority to your client will have to do his/her own small estate affidavit to claim his/her own portion of the account.

 

I hope it all works out.

 

Best,

Sara

 



Sara D. Longley, J.D., LL.M.

Attorney at Law

1718 NW 56th Street #304

Seattle, WA 98107

(206) 434-5644

Sara at Longley-law.pro

www.longley-law.pro

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Douglas Bratt
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 5:14 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] Small Estate Affidavit (RCW 11.62.010)

 

Hello Fellow List-Serv Colleagues:

 

I am dealing with a client, named to be PR in his Decedent mother’s Will, related to a relatively small investment account, in the sole name of the Decedent mother, maintained at a brokerage company whose main office is outside the State of Washington (but which has branch offices located in this State).  The small size of the investment account mirrors the small size of the entire probate estate, putting the probate estate value at well under $100,000.00.  We were finally able to convince the brokerage house that the Washington Small Estates Affidavit method should suffice as opposed to the company’s earlier insistence that we automatically had to produce “Letters.” 

 

So, when I turned to RCW 11.62.010 (2), it struck me that subsections (h) and (i) are at variance one with the other.  According to (h), the “Claiming Successor” is to give ten days’ notice to all of the “other successors” that we are going to placing the claim with the brokerage company, for the investment account contents, as a Claiming Successor.

 

However, subsection (i) requires that we include in the Affidavit a statement that we have written authority from “all other successors who have an interest” in the property the claiming successor wants to obtain, for the benefit of himself and the other “takers” under the Will.  

 

What happens if one of those “takers” has a free flowing life-style and is not often available, on short notice, and might not even receive the ten day notice because of frequent moves, and, thus, will certainly not be available to sign “written authority.”  It appears that that would leave us out in the cold, since the Claiming Successor client could not swear that he has written authority from all of the other successors.  Why require a ten day notice period if nothing occurs if one of the “other successors” does not respond to the notice? 

 

That leads me to think that each of the four separate “takers” under the will might have to be a “claiming successor” as to a one-quarter interest in the investment account, but if all four people have to jump through those hoops, the total cost might easily match the costs of a “shell probate,” filed for the sole purpose of obtaining Letters Testamentary.

 

Have I missed something in my reading of the statute?

 

And, why is it that the smallest, seemingly insignificant, assets in an Estate take much longer, and much more money, to deal with than any other assets?

 

Thanks.

 

Doug Bratt

 

 

Douglas J. Bratt

Lawyer

 



 

Office: (360) 213-2040 

Fax: (360) 213-2030

 

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email message may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us.  Thank you.

 

NOTE:  I do not use encrypted email.  Messages sent to or from my office via email are not secure and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.  This email address is not monitored at all times.  If your matter is urgent, please phone my office during regular business hours.

 

TAX ADVICE NOTICE: IRS Circular 230 requires us to advise you that, if this communication or any attachment contains any tax advice, the advice is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if the advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements. Please contact us if you have any questions about Circular 230 or would like to discuss our preparation of an opinion that conforms to these IRS rules.

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

.  

 

 

 

 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150116/31e2aa9d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1517 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150116/31e2aa9d/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7199 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150116/31e2aa9d/image004.jpg>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list