[WSBAPT] Negligent mother and wrongful death insurance monies

Richard Wills richardwills at washington-probate.com
Thu Nov 6 13:26:41 PST 2014


*I've found the case that Carol Vaughn told me about:  Estate of 
Haviland, 177 Wn.2d 68 (2013).*


On 11/6/2014 12:06 PM, Roger Hawkes wrote:
>
> Estate of Calvin H. Evans, Sr is the case; thanks MK Henderson.  I 
> thought it was a Supremes case but is Division one from May of this 
> year.  I don't know if it's on appeal.  It applies the slayer/abuser 
> statute to deny a son's inheritance but allowed that inheritance to go 
> to the abuser's children per the anti-lapse statute; presumably the 
> case is being appealed by one of us.  Who knows if that is true?  And 
> if anyone is preparing a legislative proposal to change that result?
>
> Roger Hawkes, WSBA # 5173
>
> 19909 Ballinger Way NE
>
> Shoreline, WA 98155
>
> www.hawkeslawfirm.com <http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com>
>
> 206 367 5000
>
> Fax is 206 367 4005
>
> *From:*Richard Wills [mailto:richardwills at washington-probate.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 06, 2014 11:42 AM
> *To:* WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBAPT] Negligent mother and wrongful death insurance 
> monies
>
> *I was recently but am no longer involved in a probate in which 
> Decedent's husband was convicted of having murdered the D, with the 
> conviction having been upheld on appeal.  According to D's Will, D's 
> estate went to the H, which he lost due to the slayer statute, & then 
> half to D's sibs & half to D's H's deceased sister's four adult 
> daughters.  The issue was whether the latter would take their half or 
> forfeit it under the slayer statute, resulting in D's sibs getting all 
> of the estate.
>
> I consulted with Carol Vaughn, & as I recall, she told me that she was 
> recently involved in a slayer case with assets ostensibly passing on 
> default due to the slayer statute to one or more of the slayer's 
> relatives, & in which the King County Court had held that the estate's 
> passing to the slayer's relatives benefited the slayer & thus ordered 
> the relatives to be considered as having predeceased, & that that 
> ruling was upheld on appeal. Therefore, case law appears to exist to 
> overturn the horrible result of which you speak.  No, I don't know the 
> name of the case, although it was recent.*
>
> On 11/6/2014 10:18 AM, Roger Hawkes wrote:
>
>     Be aware a recent Supremes decision interprets this to mean the
>     child of the slayer then takes the inheritance because of the anti
>     lapse statute; I think that is a horrible result, but the
>     reasoning is sound; a legislative fix is in order, I hope.  Does
>     anyone know whether one is in the works?
>
>     Roger Hawkes, WSBA # 5173
>
>     19909 Ballinger Way NE
>
>     Shoreline, WA 98155
>
>     www.hawkeslawfirm.com <http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com>
>
>     206 367 5000
>
>     Fax is 206 367 4005
>
>     *From:*Jill H. Sasser [mailto:jill.sasser at landerholm.com]
>     *Sent:* Thursday, November 06, 2014 9:58 AM
>     *To:* 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv'
>     *Subject:* Re: [WSBAPT] Negligent mother and wrongful death
>     insurance monies
>
>     Dalynne:
>
>
>     I would take a look at RCW 11.84 and case law citing this statute,
>     which might address your situation.  I think your issue might be
>     whether the mother was negligent vs. willful and unlawful (read
>     the definition of a slayer in RCW 11.84.010).
>
>     11.84.030
>     Slayer or abuser deemed to predecease decedent.
>
>     The slayer or abuser shall be deemed to have predeceased the
>     decedent as to property which would have passed from the decedent
>     or his or her estate to the slayer or abuser under the statutes of
>     descent and distribution or have been acquired by statutory right
>     as surviving spouse or surviving domestic partner or under any
>     agreement made with the decedent under the provisions of RCW
>     26.16.120
>     <http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=26.16.120> as it now
>     exists or is hereafter amended.
>
>     Jill H. Sasser | Attorney at Law
>     Landerholm Logo
>     805 Broadway Street, Suite 1000
>
>     P.O. Box 1086
>     Vancouver, WA 98666-1086
>     T: 360-816-2534 | T: 503-283-3393  | F: 360-816-2496
>     www.landerholm.com <http://www.landerholm.com/>
>
>     *From:*wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
>     <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>     [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] *On Behalf Of *Dalynne
>     Singleton
>     *Sent:* Thursday, November 06, 2014 8:41 AM
>     *To:* wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>     *Subject:* [WSBAPT] Negligent mother and wrongful death insurance
>     monies
>
>     I do not do criminal work but do remember, in law school, that
>     someone who murders another cannot collect on life insurance even
>     if the beneficiary because of his/her bad acts.  If the decedent's
>     estate is intestate, I would think the same would apply to
>     distribution of the proceeds, nothing to the person even if they
>     were to take under the intestacy statutes.
>
>     I have a situation where I opened a probate on behalf of a six
>     year old who died as a result of a once car traffic collision and
>     was appointed Administrator.  His biological mother was driving. 
>     I am co-counsel with an attorney who represents the father
>     (divorced parents) and he is deciding whether to bring claims
>     against (1) municipality on roadway design; and/or (2) negligent
>     mother.  We have hired an expert to review the scene of the
>     collision and whether the 2 potential defendants are negligent or
>     liable for the death of this young child.
>
>     Mother's insurer has offered 500k policy limits on settlement
>     under UM/UIM policy for the son's death.  There is no PIP because
>     son died at scene of collision.
>
>     Since I am the administrator, I will be researching the issue of
>     whether the mother, if found negligent in the son's death, is
>     entitled to intestate proceeds from the son's estate and if yes,
>     to what % ?
>
>     If anyone has faced this and has a brief which would get me
>     started in my research, I would appreciate any input to assist.
>
>     I will share my research with the listserve if there is
>     interest...  thanks.
>
>     Dalynne Singleton
>
>     cid:image001.jpg at 01CACA00.28153650
>     <http://www.singletonjorgensen.com/>
>
>     1541 Piperberry Way SE, Suite 105
>
>     Port Orchard, WA  98366
>
>     Phone: 360-329-4079
>
>     Fax: 360-443-1259
>
>     E-mail: dalynne at singletonjorgensen.com
>     <mailto:lara at singletonjorgensen.com>
>
>     Web: www.singletonjorgensen.com <http://www.singletonjorgensen.com/>
>
>     //
>
>     /LICENSED IN WASHINGTON AND OREGON/
>
>     IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail message (and any attachments
>     accompanying it) may contain confidential information, including
>     information protected by attorney-client privilege. The
>     information is intended only for the use of the intended
>     recipient(s).  Delivery of this message to anyone other than the
>     intended recipient(s) is not intended to waive any privilege or
>     otherwise detract from the confidentiality of the message.  If you
>     are not the intended recipient, or if this message has been
>     addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce,
>     distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission,
>     rather, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and
>     then destroy all copies of the message and its attachments, if any.
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>     	
>
>     This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!
>     Antivirus <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active.
>
>     ----------------------------
>     This e-mail message (including attachments) is for the sole use of
>     the intended recipient(s).  It contains confidential, proprietary
>     or legally protected information which is the property of 
>     Landerholm, P.S. or its clients.  Any unauthorized disclosure or
>     use of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you
>     have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately
>     and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>     ----------------------------
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     WSBAPT mailing list
>
>     WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com  <mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>
>     http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141106/f43b6827/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 4361 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141106/f43b6827/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3812 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141106/f43b6827/attachment.jpe>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list