[WSBAPT] RCW 59.18.260 - Security Deposit Question

Thu Dec 11 10:09:52 PST 2014

Jane,

I see this frequently. Doesn’t your son know that ‘mother knows best’!

Howard

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Jane Bitz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:06 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] RCW 59.18.260 - Security Deposit Question

Thanks, Howard!

My son had a Pullman landlord charge him $6.00 x 12 for each outlet cover in his apartment to be replaced by a licensed electrician. He accepted the remaining deposit money and signed off on the “damage report” before telling me. Bad landlord.

Jane Bitz.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>  [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of hhherman2
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:40 PM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv'
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] RCW 59.18.260 - Security Deposit Question

Hi Rob.

Your lease para 31 does not comply with the statute by a mile. Maybe two miles. You won’t get one of those past me without a fight.

Your landlord doesn’t even have a check list. The statute requires the landlord to produce one at the request of the tenant. “The tenant has the right to request one free replacement copy of the written checklist.”

Para 31 is not even a shadow of what is required by the statute and it is buried in the boilerplate of a printed document.

The statute requires “a written checklist or statement specifically describing” a number of specific items. 

As to the appellate case, The landlord’ estimate $X has to be weighed against the tenant’s estimate “none”.  I see no reason for the landlord not to know precisely the amount of damage if he has any intention of making repairs. When I wear the black hat and have to prepare pleadings for the landlord, I nearly always have that argument with the landlord. Often the landlord has no intention of making repairs. I am glad Neil is taking it up.

See you in court.

Howard Herman

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>  [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Rob Rowley
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:00 AM
To: WSBA RPPT; wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com> 
Subject: [WSBAPT] RCW 59.18.260 - Security Deposit Question

I was wanting to hear from some of the unlawful detainer gurus as to the below lease provision as it plays out against RCW 59.18.2 60.

I've had the situation a couple times previous where there will be a dispute with the tenant over the deposit and when I ask the my landlord clients to produce a copy of the fully executed property condition checklist that the landlord says I don't have one and that what I have is set forth in the lease.  Typically, something similar to what you see below in that the provision is tucked away inside of the lease as opposed to a separate document.

I'm of the school of thought that any time you have a security deposit dispute unless you have a fully executed separate document and you are timely on the 14 day letter that you should always return the deposit as small claims judges are legendarily tenant friendly.  (At least here in Spokane County)

Any thoughts on enforceability of the provision tucked away inside of the lease versus a separate written document?  I’d say the lease provision fails as it doesn’t fully comply with what is required in the statute.

Thanks.

RCW 59.18.260

Moneys paid as deposit or security for performance by tenant — Written rental agreement to specify terms and conditions for retention by landlord — Written checklist required.

If any moneys are paid to the landlord by the tenant as a deposit or as security for performance of the tenant's obligations in a lease or rental agreement, the lease or rental agreement shall be in writing and shall include the terms and conditions under which the deposit or portion thereof may be withheld by the landlord upon termination of the lease or rental agreement. If all or part of the deposit may be withheld to indemnify the landlord for damages to the premises for which the tenant is responsible, the rental agreement shall be in writing and shall so specify. No deposit may be collected by a landlord unless the rental agreement is in writing and a written checklist or statement specifically describing the condition and cleanliness of or existing damages to the premises and furnishings, including, but not limited to, walls, floors, countertops, carpets, drapes, furniture, and appliances, is provided by the landlord to the tenant at the commencement of the tenancy. The checklist or statement shall be signed and dated by the landlord and the tenant, and the tenant shall be provided with a copy of the signed checklist or statement. No such deposit shall be withheld on account of normal wear and tear resulting from ordinary use of the premises. The tenant has the right to request one free replacement copy of the written checklist. If the landlord collects a deposit without providing a written checklist at the commencement of the tenancy, the landlord is liable to the tenant for the amount of the deposit, and the prevailing party may recover court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. This section does not limit the tenant's right to recover moneys paid as damages or security under RCW  <http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=59.18.280> 59.18.280.

Robert R. Rowley | Attorney at Law

505 W. Riverside Ave, Suite 500

Spokane, WA  99201

Telephone: (509) 252-5074

Mobile: (509) 994-1143

Facsimile: (509) 928-3084

Email:  <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com> rob at rowleylegal.com

Web Site:  <http://www.rowleylegal.com/> www.rowleylegal.com

Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters in Washington and Idaho.

 <https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>  <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/rob-rowley/11/172/b20>  <https://twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>  <http://www.yelp.com/biz/robert-r-rowley-spokane> 

NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable protections.  If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.  Thank you for your assistance.

DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 25077 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2560 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1317 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/image003.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1295 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/image004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1351 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/image005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 939 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20141211/ebce879a/image006.jpg>