[Vision2020] Obama Responds to Trump's Iran Pull-Out

Debi Smith debismith at moscow.com
Wed May 9 18:48:53 PDT 2018


Ditto!

Debi R-S


On 5/9/2018 11:49 AM, Moscow Cares wrote:
> To you, Rose . . .
> image1.jpeg
> http://www.MoscowCares.com/I_Agree.jpg
>
> Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .
>
> "Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
> http://www.MoscowCares.com <http://www.moscowcares.com/>
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
>
>
> On May 9, 2018, at 11:35 AM, <rosejhuskey at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rosejhuskey at gmail.com>> <rosejhuskey at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rosejhuskey at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I watched the open testimony given by Ms. Hespelt this morning.  She 
>> is well trained and adroit in avoiding questions she is 
>> unable/unwilling to answer. She did cling to the “moral compass” she 
>> claims her parents provided her with (inadequate in my opinion) as 
>> proof of her righteous behavior.  It is clear that while earning her 
>> college degree in journalism - language  she missed a basic history 
>> class that would have acquainted her with the Nuremberg trials.  
>> Every offense that those wretched men committed or tolerated was 
>> certainly “legal” in Germany where they were willing 
>> cooperators/collaborators in the horror of the Third Reich.  Gina 
>> Haspel’s self-proclaimed  moral compass is of no interest to me – she 
>> tortured and guided others to do so while stationed at a black site 
>> in Thailand in 2002. To this day she is controlling the information 
>> received by the Senate committee apparently providing every “good” 
>> thing she has done in-three years at the CIA and very little of acts 
>> that are repulsive and deserving of prosecution in any society that 
>> has even a modicum of care for human rights.  It is always easy to be 
>> fair to those we agree with, but the test of morality is how we treat 
>> those who we find repulsive.  She is, in my opinion, a war criminal 
>> who is unfit to hold public office.
>>
>> Rose Huskey
>>
>> *From:* vision2020-bounces at moscow.com 
>> <mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com> <vision2020-bounces at moscow.com 
>> <mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com>> *On Behalf Of *Sunil Ramalingam
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:23 AM
>> *To:* Darrell Keim <keim153 at gmail.com <mailto:keim153 at gmail.com>>
>> *Cc:* vision2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com <mailto:vision2020 at moscow.com>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] Obama Responds to Trump's Iran Pull-Out
>>
>> This is the unhealthy break with tradition and precedent? Not the 
>> things that Trump has been saying for the last year and a half or 
>> longer? What he’s been doing?
>>
>> That’s like complaining about the color of the lifeboats on the 
>> Titanic, and remaining silent about the more important problem that 
>> there aren’t enough lifeboats .
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:*keim152 at gmail.com <mailto:keim152 at gmail.com> 
>> <keim152 at gmail.com <mailto:keim152 at gmail.com>> on behalf of Darrell 
>> Keim <keim153 at gmail.com <mailto:keim153 at gmail.com>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:00:19 AM
>> *To:* Sunil Ramalingam
>> *Cc:* Dan Carscallen; vision2020
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] Obama Responds to Trump's Iran Pull-Out
>>
>> Yes, we are both talking style over substance.  Given the current 
>> state of politics in our nation, style seems to trump substance in 
>> importance.
>>
>> We are also talking precedent being broken in a perhaps unhealthy way.
>>
>> (pun unintentional but perhaps fitting)
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Sunil Ramalingam 
>> <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com <mailto:sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     You’re both talking style over substance. I’ll give you an Obama
>>     choice I find beyond unseemly. His decision not to prosecute
>>     torturers in the Bush Administration has allowed the nomination
>>     of a war criminal for the position of head of the CIA. That’s not
>>     unseemly, that’s repulsive and disgusting.
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     *From:*vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>>     <mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com>
>>     <vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>>     <mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com>> on behalf of Dan
>>     Carscallen <areaman at moscow.com <mailto:areaman at moscow.com>>
>>     *Sent:* Wednesday, May 9, 2018 10:34:42 AM
>>     *To:* vision2020
>>     *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] Obama Responds to Trump's Iran Pull-Out
>>
>>     I’m with Darrell on this.
>>
>>     Doesn’t matter to me who is currently in the office, the previous
>>     guy commenting on his activities is a little unseemly.
>>
>>     I don’t recall anyone ever doing that.  Then again Grover
>>     Cleveland might have, since he did serve non-concurrent terms. 
>>     Of course that was just a little before my time.
>>
>>     DC
>>
>>
>>     On May 9, 2018, at 10:22, Darrell Keim <keim153 at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:keim153 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Without commenting on the issue at hand, I have an observation.
>>
>>         Can anyone recall a past president so publicly
>>         rebuking/countering his successor on a major policy change?
>>
>>         On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Nicholas Gier
>>         <ngier006 at gmail.com <mailto:ngier006 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>             Former President Barack Obama released a statement after
>>             Trump withdrew the US from the Iran nuclear deal that
>>             amounted to a point by point debunking of Trump’s
>>             falsehoods about the agreement.
>>
>>             The statement provided to PoliticusUSA by Obama’s office
>>             is lengthy but important:
>>
>>             There are few issues more important to the security of
>>             the United States than the potential spread of nuclear
>>             weapons, or the potential for even more destructive war
>>             in the Middle East. That’s why the United States
>>             negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)
>>             in the first place.
>>
>>             The reality is clear. The JCPOA is working – that is a
>>             view shared by our European allies, independent experts,
>>             and the current U.S. Secretary of Defense. The JCPOA is
>>             in America’s interest – it has significantly rolled back
>>             Iran’s nuclear program. And the JCPOA is a model for what
>>             diplomacy can accomplish – its inspections and
>>             verification regime is precisely what the United States
>>             should be working to put in place with North Korea.
>>             Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy
>>             with North Korea to succeed, walking away from the JCPOA
>>             risks losing a deal that accomplishes – with Iran – the
>>             very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.
>>
>>             That is why today’s announcement is so misguided. Walking
>>             away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest
>>             allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading
>>             diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals
>>             negotiated. In a democracy, there will always be changes
>>             in policies and priorities from one Administration to the
>>             next. But the consistent flouting of agreements that our
>>             country is a party to risks eroding America’s
>>             credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major
>>             powers.
>>
>>             Debates in our country should be informed by facts,
>>             especially debates that have proven to be divisive. So
>>             it’s important to review several facts about the JCPOA.
>>
>>             First, the JCPOA was not just an agreement between my
>>             Administration and the Iranian government. After years of
>>             building an international coalition that could impose
>>             crippling sanctions on Iran, we reached the JCPOA
>>             together with the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the
>>             European Union, Russia, China, and Iran. It is a
>>             multilateral arms control deal, unanimously endorsed by a
>>             United Nations Security Council Resolution.
>>
>>             Second, the JCPOA has worked in rolling back Iran’s
>>             nuclear program. For decades, Iran had steadily advanced
>>             its nuclear program, approaching the point where they
>>             could rapidly produce enough fissile material to build a
>>             bomb. The JCPOA put a lid on that breakout capacity.
>>             Since the JCPOA was implemented, Iran has destroyed the
>>             core of a reactor that could have produced weapons-grade
>>             plutonium; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges (over
>>             13,000) and placed them under international monitoring;
>>             and eliminated 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched
>>             uranium – the raw materials necessary for a bomb. So by
>>             any measure, the JCPOA has imposed strict limitations on
>>             Iran’s nuclear program and achieved real results.
>>
>>             Third, the JCPOA does not rely on trust – it is rooted in
>>             the most far-reaching inspections and verification regime
>>             ever negotiated in an arms control deal. Iran’s nuclear
>>             facilities are strictly monitored. International monitors
>>             also have access to Iran’s entire nuclear supply chain,
>>             so that we can catch them if they cheat. Without the
>>             JCPOA, this monitoring and inspections regime would go away.
>>
>>             Fourth, Iran is complying with the JCPOA. That was not
>>             simply the view of my Administration. The United States
>>             intelligence community has continued to find that Iran is
>>             meeting its responsibilities under the deal, and has
>>             reported as much to Congress. So have our closest allies,
>>             and the international agency responsible for verifying
>>             Iranian compliance – the International Atomic Energy
>>             Agency (IAEA).
>>
>>             Fifth, the JCPOA does not expire. The prohibition on Iran
>>             ever obtaining a nuclear weapon is permanent. Some of the
>>             most important and intrusive inspections codified by the
>>             JCPOA are permanent. Even as some of the provisions in
>>             the JCPOA do become less strict with time, this won’t
>>             happen until ten, fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years
>>             into the deal, so there is little reason to put those
>>             restrictions at risk today.
>>
>>             Finally, the JCPOA was never intended to solve all of our
>>             problems with Iran. We were clear-eyed that Iran engages
>>             in destabilizing behavior – including support for
>>             terrorism, and threats toward Israel and its neighbors.
>>             But that’s precisely why it was so important that we
>>             prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Every
>>             aspect of Iranian behavior that is troubling is far more
>>             dangerous if their nuclear program is unconstrained. Our
>>             ability to confront Iran’s destabilizing behavior – and
>>             to sustain a unity of purpose with our allies – is
>>             strengthened with the JCPOA, and weakened without it.
>>
>>             Because of these facts, I believe that the decision to
>>             put the JCPOA at risk without any Iranian violation of
>>             the deal is a serious mistake. Without the JCPOA, the
>>             United States could eventually be left with a losing
>>             choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the
>>             Middle East. We all know the dangers of Iran obtaining a
>>             nuclear weapon. It could embolden an already dangerous
>>             regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose
>>             unacceptable dangers to America’s own security; and
>>             trigger an arms race in the world’s most dangerous
>>             region. If the constraints on Iran’s nuclear program
>>             under the JCPOA are lost, we could be hastening the day
>>             when we are faced with the choice between living with
>>             that threat, or going to war to prevent it.
>>
>>             In a dangerous world, America must be able to rely in
>>             part on strong, principled diplomacy to secure our
>>             country. We have been safer in the years since we
>>             achieved the JCPOA, thanks in part to the work of our
>>             diplomats, many members of Congress, and our allies.
>>             Going forward, I hope that Americans continue to speak
>>             out in support of the kind of strong, principled,
>>             fact-based, and unifying leadership that can best secure
>>             our country and uphold our responsibilities around the
>>             globe.
>>
>>
>>                 Obama made a critical point
>>
>>             Much of Trump’s argument for killing the Iran deal was
>>             based on the false premise that the deal was a failure if
>>             it didn’t address all of the problems with Iran’s
>>             behavior, but the nuclear deal was never meant to do
>>             that. By design, it dealt with Iran’s nuclear program.
>>             Republicans have used this rhetorical device on the issue
>>             of health care, for example, as well. It is a false
>>             argument that seeks to turn something successful into a
>>             failure.
>>
>>             It is rare for a former president to come out with such a
>>             strong statement against an action taken by a current
>>             president. All evidence and even members of Trump’s own
>>             administration say that the deal was working.
>>
>>             For more discussion about this story join our Rachel
>>             Maddow and MSNBC group.
>>             <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fgroups%2F1944900445770755%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbab469f5ae8e4b87dbf808d5b5d32bc2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636614840926930976&sdata=y0NHcNILzQOBYDGmKb%2BIRJAtwuYreYyl4bfdH19RNrI%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>
>>             -- 
>>
>>             A society grows great when old men plant trees whose
>>             shade they know they shall never sit in.
>>
>>             -Greek proverb
>>
>>
>>             “Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed
>>             immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one’s
>>             understanding without guidance from another. This
>>             immaturity is self- imposed when its cause lies not in
>>             lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage
>>             to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude!
>>             ‘Have courage to use your own understand-ing!—that is the
>>             motto of enlightenment.
>>
>>             --Immanuel Kant
>>
>>
>>             =======================================================
>>              List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>              serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>             http://www.fsr.net
>>             <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsr.net&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbab469f5ae8e4b87dbf808d5b5d32bc2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636614840926930976&sdata=8Dr3v9J2U%2F70Mg7iIrDP5IZmQkVzFl0jWSkMLAtnMvs%3D&reserved=0>
>>                       mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>             <mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>             =======================================================
>>
>>         =======================================================
>>         List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>         serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>         http://www.fsr.net
>>         <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsr.net&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbab469f5ae8e4b87dbf808d5b5d32bc2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636614840926930976&sdata=8Dr3v9J2U%2F70Mg7iIrDP5IZmQkVzFl0jWSkMLAtnMvs%3D&reserved=0>
>>         mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>         =======================================================
>>
>>
>>     =======================================================
>>      List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>      serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>     http://www.fsr.net
>>     <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsr.net&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cea31d2fd89f04e42920508d5b5d6bad4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636614856211659612&sdata=PY3ZSPhkO4Je6z5VuBbHbJC0MRD4ZzxghOgXqlseCvA%3D&reserved=0>
>>               mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com <mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>     =======================================================
>>
>> =======================================================
>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> http://www.fsr.net
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>
>
> =======================================================
>   List services made available by First Step Internet,
>   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                 http://www.fsr.net
>            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20180509/8316ecf8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image1.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 101291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20180509/8316ecf8/image1-0001.jpeg>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list