[Vision2020] Dick Van Dyke introduces Bernie Sanders (was: Trump nonsense)
kmmos1 at frontier.com
Sat Jun 4 18:17:16 PDT 2016
On 6/4/2016 2:56 PM, Dan Carscallen wrote:
> Sure would be nice if folks (candidates included) would tell me why I
> should vote for a particular person instead of why I shouldn't vote
> for a particular candidate.
> Just sayin'
You should vote for Bernie Sanders, or those people who will
enable and implement Bernie Sanders' policies and ideas, so that we can
collectively gain more control over who actually makes the laws under
which we must live, and make those individuals more accountable to the
electorate. Campaign finance reform is the first step, and beyond that
electoral system and voting geography selection and management reform
should follow. (Yes, I really do suspect that you know how to spell
gerrymandering, but it's such an old-fashioned, and fundamentally
Remember, 2020 is only four years away, and that means another
national census, and reapportionment and redistricting follow. We need
to be much better prepared for these not-very-far-away exercises not
only for their usual details, but also for the structures within which
they operate. Significant structural reforms toward more voter
awareness, education, and understanding, and better structural electoral
involvement can take us away from purchased and produced elections and
toward participatory democracy.
Your first voting preference should be for Bernie Sanders for
these reasons and many more. If Bernie Sanders does not achieve the
presidential nomination directly, then he must be selected as the
vice-presidential nominee. If he is not selected as the
vice-presidential nominee by the presidential nominee, then the
delegates on the convention floor should vote to remand to themselves
the power to select the vice-presidential nominee, and then they should
vote the vice-presidential nomination to Senator Sanders.
Your second voting preference should be to elect those delegates
to various positions of party authority to make these preferences happen.
The fact of the matter is that the Democratic Party, and the
American nation, need Senator Sanders' sound policy judgement readily
available for the next presidential administration. Should it come to
pass that the first female American president is not able to complete
her first term in office for whatever reason, having a Vice-President
Sanders is as good a backup president as the electorate may expect, and
perhaps better than it sometimes deserves. So, we must all do what we
are able to do to ensure Senator Sanders is in one position or the
other of the 2016 presidential ballot, and we should vote for that
ticket to provide public service of the best quality to all of us.
Beyond the national executive offices, we should vote in favor of
those federal candidates most likely to support the Sanders policy
At the Idaho state level, it would be nice for all of us if we
would vote for educated, competent, non-embarrassing candidates who
understand that we live together in a society that includes human beings
in various family combinations, as opposed to various fantasy creatures
from economic and political imaginations.
Here's a thought. We might vote for state legislative candidates
who are willing to raise state legislative pay to levels that allow a
legislator to be employed full-time as a legislator, instead of relying
on semi-financially independent people who have reached stages in their
financial wealth accumulations and career development (meaning
semi-retired), and many of whom can, and apparently do, ignore, disdain,
and turn unseeing eyes toward the voters who elect them. Were
legislators paid enough to allow more diverse candidates to run for
those offices, perhaps the nature of the legislature would then be able
to better reflect the population of the state it is supposed to serve.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Vision2020