[Vision2020] Idaho Department of Fish and Game: UI did not get trapping OK

Wed Aug 31 11:41:26 PDT 2016

"If, in accordance with this section, a responsible owner cannot be found, the animal may be offered for adoption to a responsible person in lieu of destruction."

Courtesy of Paragraph 3511 (Permitting Animals To Go Without Care -- Abandoned Animals To Be Humanely Destroyed), Chapter 35 (Animal Care), Title 25 (Animals) of the Idaho statutes ar:

https://legislature.idaho.gov/idstat/Title25/T25CH35SECT25-3511.htm

---------------------------------

TITLE 25 
ANIMALS
CHAPTER 35 
ANIMAL CARE
25-3511.  PERMITTING ANIMALS TO GO WITHOUT CARE -- ABANDONED ANIMALS TO BE HUMANELY DESTROYED. Every owner, custodian or possessor of any animal, who shall permit the same to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square or lot of any city, county or precinct, without proper care and attention, as determined by an Idaho licensed veterinarian, or a representative of the division, shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be punished in accordance with section 25-3520A, Idaho Code. It shall be the duty of any law enforcement officer or animal care and control officer, subject to the restrictions of section 25-3501A, Idaho Code, to take possession of the animal so abandoned or neglected, and care for the same until final disposition of such animal is determined in accordance with section 25-3520A or 25-3520B, Idaho Code. Every sick, disabled, infirm or crippled animal which shall be abandoned in any city, county or precinct, may if after due search no owner can be found therefor, be humanely destroyed, or other provision made for the animal by or on the order of such officer; and it shall be the duty of all law enforcement officers or animal care and control officers, to cause the same to be humanely destroyed, or other provision made therefor, on information of such abandonment. Subject to the restrictions of section 25-3501A, Idaho Code, such officer may likewise take charge of any animal that by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness or neglect, is unfit for the activity it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated; and, if such animal is not then in custody of its owner, such officer shall give notice thereof to such owner, if known, and may provide suitable care for such animal until final disposition of such animal is determined in accordance with section 25-3520A or 25-3520B, Idaho Code. If, in accordance with this section, a responsible owner cannot be found, the animal may be offered for adoption to a responsible person in lieu of destruction.

---------------------------------

Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .

"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
http://www.MoscowCares.com

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

"There's room at the top they are telling you still.
But first you must learn how to smile as you kill,
If you want to be like the folks on the hill."

- John Lennon

> On Aug 31, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Saundra Lund <v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Tom, for sharing the article, and thanks to Lee Rozen for the correction (which I’ve indicated below).
>  
> I’d like to know when the UI will be cited for apparently violating Section 5-16 of the Moscow Police Regulations?  Also, what are the potential penalties for each of the multiple infractions?
>  
> I’d also like to know if the construction and use of an jury-rigged carbon dioxide gas chamber to asphyxiate the trapped kittens and cats to unconsciousness (before the reported fatal injections were administered) is a violation of city or state laws?
>  
> Is there any investigation to ensure that the carbon dioxide and home-made chamber were used in compliance with state and federal occupational health and safety regulations?
>  
> Also, the “most likely to not be inhumane” use of carbon dioxide requires very specific conditions, and I’d like to know if there’s any investigation into the instances to determine whether or not humane standards were violated?
>  
> Given the conflicting info that’s come out of the UI about the whole “project,” I think it would be foolhardy to blindly trust that the self-serving statements of the UI are accurate.
>  
> As a taxpayer, Moscow resident, UI alum, and spouse of a UI faculty member, I feel very strongly that the UI should not be given special treatment by getting away with ignoring our laws and regulations.  I think many/most/all of us were proud that MPD did its best to investigate the criminal behavior of the football players who stole several hundred dollars’ worth of merchandise from the Bookstore in spite of a lack of cooperation by “the powers that be” at the UI.
>  
> I am . . . concerned about the conflicting information that’s come out of the UI about this whole disturbing debacle, and I think we as a community need to send a very clear message to the UI that part of the being a good neighbor includes following our City’s Police Regulations.  For those who don’t remember, we’ve had disturbing and heart-breaking consequences when individuals have taken it upon themselves to set traps within the city, and I feel strongly the UI needs to know that this kind of illegal behavior absolutely will not be tolerated here, whether by individuals or by institutions.
>  
>  
>  
> Saundra Lund
> Moscow, ID
>  
> The least I can do is speak out for those who cannot speak out for themselves.
> ~ Jane Goodall
>  
>  
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Moscow Cares
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:32 AM
> To: Moscow Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Subject: [Vision2020] Idaho Department of Fish and Game: UI did not get trapping OK
>  
> Perhaps the next time the State of Idaho considers trimming its education budget, it can start with the paycheck of University of Idaho's campus veterinarian Peter Autenried.
>  
> Courtesy of today's (August 30, 2016) Moscow-Pullman Daily News with a special note of appreciation to Saundra Lund for bringing up this subject.
>  
> ---------------------------------
>  
> IDFG: UI did not get trapping OK
> Cat trapping program reportedly no longer in effect on campus
> Statements by University of Idaho's campus veterinarian Peter Autenried and communications personnel were called into question Monday when two agencies denied being notified or consulted concerning the trapping and euthanasia of feral cats on campus.
> 
> Autenried said Wednesday seven feral cats had been trapped and killed at the university since January. Autenried said some of the animals were kittens, but they "had snotty noses and some of them were pretty skinny, so we decided to euthanize them. We did not keep any, although we would have if we had a facility set up to keep them, treat them, spay them, and place them, if they would be suited to do so."
> 
> Autenried said he received authorization to trap feral cats from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, in accordance with Moscow city code, and that he had asked staff at the Humane Society of the Palouse for assistance in handling the cats. UI communications personnel confirmed Autenried's claims to the Daily News on Wednesday and to KREM 2 in Spokane on Saturday.
> 
> Mark Carson, regional conservation officer for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, said Monday, however, his department would not have issued authorization to the university, as it does not deal with feral cats. That responsibility falls to officials in Moscow.
> 
> According to Section 5-16 of Moscow Police Regulations, "Unless authorized by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game ... no person shall set a trap to catch an animal (other than a mouse, rat, gopher, vole or mole) within City limits, except a person specifically authorized by the Council or by the Chief of Police or designee."
> 
> Moscow Police Chief James Fry said the university did not procure authorization from him, and Mayor Bill Lambert said the authorization did not come from the council.
> 
> While Autenried and Stefany Bales, UI executive director of university communications and marketing, said Wednesday Fish and Game had given the authorization, UI Communications Director Jodi Walker said Monday she was unable to address the statement made by Fish and Game, as the office of communications received its information from Autenried.
> 
> Autenried and the communications department also said Wednesday the university had reached out to the HSOP earlier in the spring for help with the feral cat problem but was told there were no resources available.
> 
> According to Trina Pickett at HSOP, the university's problem with feral cats was not known to the office until late last week and they had not been asked to help.
> 
> Walker said she was unable to respond to the statement as, once again, the communications office received its information from Autenreid.
> 
> According to the communications office, the university's program of trapping and euthanizing feral cats was suspended last week and Autenried's Wednesday statement of there being three traps left on the UI campus - soon to be moved to a new location near the Lionel Hampton School of Music for further trapping - was no longer accurate.
> 
> ---------------------------------
>  
> Stay tuned, Moscow, because . . .
> 
> 
> "Moscow Cares" 
> http://www.MoscowCares.com
>   
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20160831/f3b7ce4b/attachment-0001.html>