[Vision2020] Political correctness run amok

Fri May 2 17:56:51 PDT 2014

Sure, I know that.  And Tinker wasn’t a good example for me to use for that reason.  But,  I still think the application of the principal is the same.  Now folks are calling it a privacy issue. That’s interesting.  A goodly number are really selective about what constitutes a right to privacy.  If it’s a woman’s right to choose (for example) there is no right to privacy, they say.  

Sue 

From: Sunil 
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:22 AM
To: vision 2020 
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Political correctness run amok

Sue,

The First Amendment was implicated in Tinker because the school board is a state actor. It's not implicated here because the NBA is not a state actor.

Sunil

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: suehovey at moscow.com
To: scooterd408 at hotmail.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:09:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Political correctness run amok

But in Tinker v. Des Moines SD the issue was all about 1st Amendment Rights and did not involve government censorship or prosecution...made clear in the case...nevertheless the ruling was her first amendment rights “did not stop at the school house door.”  
sue h 

From: Scott Dredge 
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:50 PM
To: viz 
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Political correctness run amok

Donald Sterling's First Amendment rights are fully intact as he's not facing censorship from the government and he's also not facing prosecution for what he said in private.  Apparently on the same tape, Sterling said 'I love black people', but the conversation needs to be taking in totality and full context and not reduced, as usual, to only a few sound bytes that resonate with Tom Hansen rendering a verdict & decree.

Also interesting to note is that the NAACP was planning to give Sterling a 2nd lifetime achievement award on May 15th.  Sterling received his first NAACP award 5 years ago.

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/04/donald-sterling-naacp-award

All of this is so...what's the right phrase...black and white?

-Scott

On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:19 PM, "Sue Hovey" <suehovey at moscow.com> wrote:

  Frankly, I think he’s a “dirty old man” with a great looking young woman friend, and his prejudices and bigotry extend far beyond what he has just said.  Even so,  it would seem to me he has a First Amendment right to say what he thinks.  Not knowing what the bylaws of the NBA say to this issue, I do wonder how they can ban him from games when he owns the team, and I imagine the courts will be asked to resolve that issue. If the KKK has a First Amendment right to march down the streets of American cities (and I don’t argue they do) then maybe Magic Johnson should just have to “suck it up.”   I believe the First Amendment is precious...and yes, there are consequences for speech that harms, but we have to be very wary of consequences for something that is purely speech and not overt behavior, which is discrimination and often illegal.  

  Perhaps the NBA could look into the Cliven Bundy case and remove him from his ranch just as Sterling has been removed from the Arena.  Well maybe their bylaws don’t extend that far.  Damn.    

  Sue H. 

  From: Ron Force 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 2:14 PM
  To: Gary Crabtree ; Paul Rumelhart 
  Cc: Vision 2020 
  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Political correctness run amok

  It wasn't just "black people" dude, it was Magic Johnson!

  Ron Force 
  Moscow Idaho USA
  On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:59 PM, Gary Crabtree <moscowlocksmith at gmail.com> wrote:

    The guy should be thanking his lucky stars that he wasn't illegally taped stating that he believed that marriage should be between a man and a women exclusively. They would be calling for a total confiscation of all his worldly goods and a summary execution.

    g

    On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:

      Donald Sterling has now been banned for life from games and practices by the NBA and fined $2.5 million dollars.  Why? Because he was recorded saying bad things about black people in a PRIVATE conversation he was having with his girlfriend.  One that was very likely recorded illegally. Does this strike anyone here as being over-the-top?  Or am I the only one not on the "OMG! He said bad things about black people!" bandwagon?

      I hate that we have become a nation of nattering ninnies.

      Paul

      =======================================================
      List services made available by First Step Internet,
      serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                    http://www.fsr.net
               mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
      =======================================================

    =======================================================
    List services made available by First Step Internet,
    serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                  http://www.fsr.net
              mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
    =======================================================

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  =======================================================
  List services made available by First Step Internet,
  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                 http://www.fsr.net
            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  =======================================================
  =======================================================
  List services made available by First Step Internet,
  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                http://www.fsr.net
           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  =======================================================

======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com =======================================================

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com =======================================================

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20140502/025bf416/attachment-0001.html>