[Vision2020] respect this forum

Donovan Arnold donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 9 10:09:08 PDT 2013


I agree, Sue. I think when anyone is attacked personally everyone feels like they could also be attacked if they speak their opinions and ideas on the forum. So many will not join the forum. This prevents ideas and opinions from being interjected into the forum that could be productive and helpful to the community or individuals that may have benefited from that interaction on V2020. 
 
If someone feels a need to attack something, attack the flaws in ideas, not the person with what they think is a flawed idea or flawed belief. Even Albert Einstein had errors in this theories at some point, so none of us are impervious to flaws and imperfections in our knowledge and thinking. People need the interactions about their ideas and beliefs without the insecurities that their personal imperfections will be exposed and attacked in public for doing so. 
 
Donovan J. Arnold
 
 
 

________________________________
 From: Sue Hovey <suehovey at moscow.com>
To: Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com>; rhayes at frontier.com 
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2013 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] respect this forum
  


Yes, I agree.  I’m trying valiantly not to post snide or sarcastic 
remarks that are “gotchas,” even though I sort of enjoyed doing it in the past, 
particularly if I thought of a really good one.  One reason: at my age I 
need all the friends I can get, and pissing folks off probably works against 
that goal.   

Sueh 

From: Ted Moffett  
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 3:58 PM 
To: rhayes at frontier.com  
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com  
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] respect this forum 
 In about a decade of following Vision2020, I have read numerous requests 
for more civility on this list.  While in some respects I agree with these 
requests, they have never changed the frequency of personal insults.  Some 
have even argued that the mud slinging actually increases list participation, or 
list readership, and that the list would be more boring, with fewer readers, if 
everyone was a perfect angel. 

Don Henley's (one of the main musicians behind the Eagles) solo career song 
"Dirty Laundry" expresses it... "Dirty laundry" in media sells!  "We all 
know that Crap is King 
Give us dirty laundry!" 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46bBWBG9r2o 

Lyrics to the song below: 

I make my living off the Evening News 
Just give me something-something 
I can use 
People love it when you lose, 
They love dirty laundry 

Well, I coulda been an actor, but I wound up here 
I just have to 
look good, I don't have to be clear 
Come and whisper in my ear 
Give us 
dirty laundry 

Kick 'em when they're up 
Kick 'em when they're down 
Kick 'em when they're up 
Kick 'em when they're down 
Kick 'em when 
they're up 
Kick 'em when they're down 
Kick 'em when they're up 
Kick 
'em all around 

We got the bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who 
Comes on 
at five 
She can tell you 'bout the plane crash with a gleam 
In her eye 
It's interesting when people die- 
Give us dirty laundry 

Can we 
film the operation? 
Is the head dead yet? 
You know, the boys in the 
newsroom got a 
Running bet 
Get the widow on the set! 
We need dirty 
laundry 

You don't really need to find out what's going on 
You don't 
really want to know just how far it's gone 
Just leave well enough alone 
Eat your dirty laundry 

Kick 'em when they're up 
Kick 'em when 
they're down  
Kick 'em when they're up 
Kick 'em when they're down 

Kick 'em 
when they're up 
Kick 'em when they're down 
Kick 'em when they're stiff 
Kick 'em all around 

Dirty little secrets 
Dirty little lies 
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody's pie 
We love to cut you 
down to size 
We love dirty laundry 

We can do "The Innuendo" 
We 
can dance and sing 
When it's said and done we haven't told you a thing 
We all know that Crap is King 
Give us dirty laundry! 
--------------------------------------- 
Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett 



On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, rhayes at frontier.com <rhayes at frontier.com> wrote:

 
>Hello, 
>Please refrain from personal banter on this forum. The personal attacks  do nothing but devalue both the arguments and opinions posted, but also the  people posting the blather.  
>While I know that V2020 is a free-for-all no moderation community forum,  let's show some respect to the majority who use this service to become better  informed citizens of the region. 
>I suggest that if someone throws a "bomb," do not respond. If you have a  legitimate opinion, state that opinion and leave the personal attack out of  it.  
>On an entirely different subject, I know that farmers don't like rain  right now, but it certainly is a blessing for those with gardens and  lawns.  
> 
>From: "vision2020-request at moscow.com" <vision2020-request at moscow.com>
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
>Sent: Sunday, September 1,  2013 2:53 PM
>Subject: Vision2020 Digest, Vol 87, Issue 4
> 
>
>Send Vision2020 mailing list submissions to
>    vision2020 at moscow.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via 
  the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020
>or, 
  via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    vision2020-request at moscow.com
>
>You can reach the 
  person managing the list at
>    vision2020-owner at moscow.com
>
>When replying, please 
  edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of 
  Vision2020 digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>  1. Re: And yet 
  no apology . . . (Scott Dredge)
>  2. This won't surprise any of us - 
  (Rosemary 
  Huskey)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 
  1
>Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:59:12 -0600
>From: Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>
>To: Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>,  Wayne Price <bear at moscow.com>
>Cc: viz <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And 
  yet no apology . . .
>Message-ID: <BLU175-W18D7F58A356E0C0D19CFCBE4370 at phx.gbl>
>Content-Type: 
  text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>For emails intended to be 'offlist', 
  please remember to remove the viz alias from the cc: list.  As Saundra 
  wrote recently to another member who was posting dirty language: 'Have some 
  respect.  We have young people who read Vision 2020, and they do not need 
  to be subjected to your foul explosions.  I don?t need to be subjected to 
  your foul explosions . . . no one does.'
>
>It's best to keep displays of 
  'lack of mature responsibility' private.  And if we have young people who 
  read Vision 2020 as well as other people who are decent, moral, and 
  upstanding, it would be best to ix-nay any references to ircle-say erks-jay as 
  well as similar post from you regarding ubber-ray olls-day and so 
  forth.
>
>From: thansen at moscow.com
>Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:01:16 
  -0700
>To: bear at moscow.com
>CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And yet 
  no apology . . .
>
>I have more important things on my mind and on my 
  to-do list for the next several months, Mr. Price, than to play 
  I'm-rubber-you're-glue with some poorly equipped third grader here on the Viz 
  ad nauseum.  So tell ya what . . 
>Here is a message you can share with 
  your buddies at your next circle jerk and/or at the sandbox during your next 
  show-and-tell . . .
>You win!  
>
>
>On Aug 31, 2013, at 6:40 AM, 
  Wayne Price <bear at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>STRONGLY advise you to 
  wish in one hand, and............................ well, you know the 
  rest.
>
>With all the due respect you 
  deserve,
>
>Wayne
>
>
>
>
>On Aug 31, 2013, at 3:22 AM, Tom 
  Hansen wrote:Although I have recently been scolded for what has been 
  interpreted and perceived to be a lack of maturity on my part, I stepped 
  forward and apologized, both publicly and privately, to those affected.  
  After all, to do less would (and should) be considered a lack of mature 
  responsibility.
>Subsequently, my feet have been put to the proverbial fire 
  here on the Viz by certain members who place themselves on the moral 
  highground.
>Yet, as reflected in the public exchange below, I have been 
  referred to as "racist" by Wayne Price, based on nothing more than his 
  wrongful characterization of an article I posted.
>No apology from Mr. 
  Price.  No retraction.  
>Accountability and mature responsibility 
  are fates all of us must bear, not just those to whom some of us hold a degree 
  of animosity.
>As such, Mr. Price should account for his insulting 
  comment.  Yet, given the character of those who placed themseves on the 
  previously mentioned moral highground, none is expected.
>Seeya 'round town, 
  Moscow, because . . .
>"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your 
  pants on)http://www.moscowcares.com/ Tom HansenMoscow,  Idaho
>"There's room at the top they are telling you still But first you 
  must learn how to smile as you kill If you want to be like the folks on the 
  hill."
>- John Lennon
>
>
>On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Tom Hansen 
  <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>No, Mr. Price.  
>That is not racist.  The humor was aimed directly at former Army 
  Major Nidal Hasan, the killer of 13 American soldiers and one unborn child at 
  Fort Hood, Texas, who was sentenced to death a mere few hours ago.
>Howver, 
  you are entitled to your opinion, as shallow as it is.
>Seeya 'round town, 
  Moscow, because . . .
>"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your 
  pants on)http://www.moscowcares.com/ Tom HansenMoscow,  Idaho
>"There's room at the top they are telling you still But first you 
  must learn how to smile as you kill If you want to be like the folks on the 
  hill."
>- John Lennon
>
>
>On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Wayne Price 
  <bear at moscow.com>  wrote:
>
>And that's not racist?
>Tom, there are only two things wrong 
  with you - your face!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Aug 28, 2013, 
  at 1:41 PM, Tom Hansen wrote:Courtesy of the Duffel Blog at:
>http://www.duffelblog.com/2013/08/nidal-hasan-granted-terminal-leave/-------------------------------------Nidal  Hasan Granted Terminal Leave<AP_nidal_hasan_jef_130806_16x9_992.jpg>FORT  HOOD, TX ? A military jury has granted Army Maj. Nidal Hasan terminal leave  today, sparking consternation throughout the military.The decision fanned  flames sparked by recent revelations that he was continuing to receive full  pay and benefits while on trial for an act of workplace violence that left 13  dead and wounded more than 30 others. Witnesses reported that Hasan shouted  ?Allahu Akbar? ? Arabic for ?I am dissatisfied with my working conditions? ?  during the attack.By granting him terminal leave, the Army will transfer him  from active duty to the ?involuntary reserve, dead? list. He will be required  to undergo a final physical, including a single vaccination through an IV.His  pay and benefits, including respiration and cardiac function, will be  stopped.At
 press time, many observers were !
>upset that he had not received 
  a harsher sentence.
>-------------------------------------
>
>Seeya 
  'round town, Moscow, because . . .
>"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can 
  have with your pants on)http://www.moscowcares.com/ Tom HansenMoscow,  Idaho
>"There's room at the top they are telling you still But first you 
  must learn how to smile as you kill If you want to be like the folks on the 
  hill."
>- John Lennon
>  
  =======================================================
>List services made 
  available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of the Palouse 
  since 
  1994.
>              http://www.fsr.net/
>          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
>=======================================================
>List 
  services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of 
  the Palouse since 
  1994.
>              http://www.fsr.net/
>          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>==============================================================================================================
>List 
  services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of 
  the Palouse since 
  1994.
>              http://www.fsr.net/
>          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
>
>=======================================================
>List 
  services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of 
  the Palouse since 
  1994.
>              http://www.fsr.net/
>          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================                         
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was 
  scrubbed...
>URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130901/5170fb49/attachment-0001.html>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 
  2
>Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:52:07 -0700
>From: "Rosemary Huskey" <donaldrose at cpcinternet.com>
>To: "'Moscow Vision 2020'" 
  <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: [Vision2020] This 
  won't surprise any of us -
>Message-ID: 
  <00d801cea75d$84dbd680$8e938380$@com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; 
  charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>A Plutocracy Ruled by Self-Centered 
  Jerks?
>
>
>August 27, 2013
>
>by Joshua Holland <http://billmoyers.com/author/hollandj/> 
>
>
><http://cdn.billmoyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/AP100715021885_size.jp
>g> 
  Hassan Nemazee, the wealthy Manhattan investment banker, steps over 
  a
>security chain as he leaves federal court in Manhattan after being 
  sentenced
>to 12 years in prison for bank fraud. (AP Photo/Larry 
  Neumeister)
>
>Hassan Nemazee, the wealthy Manhattan investment banker, 
  steps over a
>security chain as he leaves federal court in Manhattan after 
  being sentenced
>to 12 years in prison for bank fraud. (AP Photo/Larry 
  Neumeister)
>
>Two studies released last week confirmed what most of us 
  already knew: the
>ultra-wealthy tend to be narcissistic and have a greater 
  sense of
>entitlement than the rest of us, and Congress only pays attention 
  to their
>interests. Both studies are consistent with earlier 
  research.
>
>In the first study
><http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/08/19/0146167213501699.full#aff-1
>> 
  , published in the current Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
>Paul 
  Piff of UC Berkeley conducted five experiments which demonstrated 
  that
>"higher social class is associated with increased entitlement 
  and
>narcissism." Given the opportunity, Piff also found that they were 
  more
>likely to check themselves out in a mirror than were those of lesser 
  means.
>
>Piff looked at how participants scored on a standard scale of 
  "psychological
>entitlement," and found that those of a high social class - 
  based on income
>levels, education and occupational prestige - were more 
  likely to say "I
>honestly feel I'm just more deserving than others," while 
  people further
>down the social ladder were likelier to respond, "I do not 
  necessarily
>deserve special treatment." 
>
>In an earlier 
  study
><http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/02/21/1118373109.full.pdf+html>  ,
>published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of 
  Sciences,
>Piff and four researchers from the University of Toronto 
  conducted a series
>of experiments which found that "upper-class individuals 
  behave more
>unethically than lower-class individuals." This included being 
  more likely
>to "display unethical decision-making," steal, lie during a 
  negotiation and
>cheat in order to win a contest.
>
>In one telling 
  experiment, the researchers observed a busy intersection, and
>found that 
  drivers of luxury cars were more likely to cut off other drivers
>and less 
  likely to stop for pedestrians crossing the street than those
>behind the 
  wheels of more modest vehicles.  "In our crosswalk study, none of
>the 
  cars in the beater-car category drove through the crosswalk," Piff told
>The 
  New York Times
><http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/12/the-rich-drive-differently-a-stu
>dy-suggests/?_r=0> 
  . "But you see this huge boost in a driver's likelihood
>to commit 
  infractions in more expensive cars." He added: "BMW drivers are
>the 
  worst."
>
>Summing up previous research on the topic, Piff notes that 
  upper-class
>individuals also "showed reduced sensitivity to others' 
  suffering" as
>compared with working- and middle-class 
  people.
>
>Lower-class individuals are more likely to spend time taking 
  care of others,
>and they are more embedded in social networks that depend 
  on mutual aid. By
>contrast, upper-class individuals prioritize independence 
  from others: They
>are less motivated than lower-class individuals to build 
  social
>relationships and instead seek to differentiate themselves from 
  others.
>
>These findings may appear to represent a bit of psychological 
  trivia, but a
>study
><http://prq.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/10/04/1065912912459567.abstract?p
>apetoc>  
  to be published in Political Science Quarterly by Thomas Hayes, a
>scholar 
  at Trinity University, finds that U.S. senators respond almost
>exclusively 
  to the interests of their wealthiest constituents - those more
>likely to be 
  unethical and less sensitive to the suffering of others,
>according to 
  Piff.
>
>Hayes took data from the Annenberg Election Survey - a massive 
  database of
>public opinion representing the views of 90,000 voters - and 
  compared them
>with their senators' voting records from 2001 through 2010. 
  From 2007
>through 2010, U.S. senators were somewhat responsive to the 
  interests of the
>middle class, but hadn't been for the first 6 years Hayes 
  studied. The views
>of the poor didn't factor into legislators' voting 
  tendencies at all.
>
>As Eric Dolan noted for
><http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/08/19/oligarchic-tendencies-study-finds-onl
>y-the-wealthy-get-represented-in-the-senate/> 
  The Raw Story, "The neglect of
>lower income groups was a bipartisan affair. 
  Democrats were not any more
>responsive to the poor than Republicans." Hayes 
  wrote that his analysis
>"suggests oligarchic tendencies in the American 
  system, a finding echoed in
>other research."
>
>Hayes' study is 
  consistent with earlier research, including Princeton
>University scholar 
  Larry Bartels' 2005 study
><http://www.princeton.edu/~bartels/economic.pdf>  of  "Economic Inequality
>and Political Representation."
>
>There are a few 
  of ways of looking at these findings. They could be the
>result of genuinely 
  held ideological beliefs which happen to justify
>inequality and 
  privilege.
>
>According to OpenSecrets <http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/averages.php> ,
>the 
  average net worth of senators in 2011 was $11.9 million, so it could be
>a 
  matter of legislators advancing their own interests and those of the
>people 
  with whom they socialize and associate.
>
>But MIT economist Daron 
  Acemoglu, who co-authored
><http://www.amazon.com/Why-Nations-Fail-Prosperity-ebook/dp/B0058Z4NR8>  Why
>Nations Fail with Harvard's James Robinson, says that this kind of 
  political
>inequality is a product of widening economic disparities. "It's a 
  general
>pattern throughout history," he told Think Progress
><http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/23/451166/acemoglu-income-inequali
>ty-political-powe/> 
  . "When economic inequality increases, the people who
>have become 
  economically more powerful will often attempt to use that power
>in order to 
  gain even more political power. And once they are able to
>monopolize 
  political power, they will start using that for changing the
>rules in their 
  favor. And that sort of political inequality is the real
>danger that's 
  facing the United States."
>
>
>
>-------------- next part 
  --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130901/cf72b8ae/attachment.html>
>-------------- 
  next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: 
  image001.jpg
>Type: image/jpeg
>Size: 21599 bytes
>Desc: not 
  available
>URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130901/cf72b8ae/attachment.jpg>
>
>------------------------------
>
>=======================================================
>List 
  services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of 
  the Palouse since 
  1994.
>              http://www.fsr.net/
>          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
>
>End 
  of Vision2020 Digest, Vol 87, Issue 
  4
>*****************************************
>
>
>
>=======================================================
>List 
  services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of 
  the Palouse since 
  1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net/
>          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
> 
 

________________________________

=======================================================
List services made 
available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse 
since 
1994.
               
http://www.fsr.net
          
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
              http://www.fsr.net/
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130909/17b9104d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list