[Vision2020] Question, V-Peeps . . .

Saundra Lund v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm
Fri Oct 18 02:23:04 PDT 2013


+1 from me, and I think Paul is a +1 as well.

 

 

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Dredge
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:24 PM
To: Paul Rumelhart; Tom Hansen
Cc: viz
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Question, V-Peeps . . .

 

Tom wrote:
<Is Sen. Ted Cruz constitutionally eligible to run for President of the
United States?>

Yes.

  _____  

Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:24:36 -0700
From: godshatter at yahoo.com
To: thansen at moscow.com
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Question, V-Peeps . . .

It was in an earlier post of mine.  Here is the quote from Wikipedia I
posted:

>From Wikipedia:

"

The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen, and
various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning.
A 2011 Congressional Research Service
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Research_Service>  report stated
that

The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term
"natural born" citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S.
citizenship "by birth" or "at birth", either by being born "in" the United
States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by
being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other
situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at birth". Such
term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by
birth or at birth, and who was thus born an "alien" required to go through
the legal process of "naturalization
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization> " to become a U.S. citizen.[1]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause#cite_note-1> 

The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several
decisions of the United States Supreme Court
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States>  and lower
courts dealing with the question of eligibility for citizenship by birth,
but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a
specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a
natural-born citizen."

Here is the link to the "natural born citizen" Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause

Here is a link to the actual report (as cited by the Wikipedia page):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42097.pdf

I haven't read the report in it's entirety yet.

Paul

 

 

 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:10 PM, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>
wrote:

Care to share a link, Mr. Rumelhart?

 

Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .

 

"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)

http://www.MoscowCares.com <http://www.moscowcares.com/> 

  

Tom Hansen

Moscow, Idaho

 

"There's room at the top they are telling you still 

But first you must learn how to smile as you kill 
If you want to be like the folks on the hill."

 

- John Lennon

 

 


On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:

 

 

 


======================================================= List services made
available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse
since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20131018/ca01987c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list